A study on the dose distributions near the eye lens and the legs. Part 2-Interventional radiology

被引:4
|
作者
Domienik, J. [1 ]
Rusicka, D. [1 ]
Szubert, W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, PL-91348 Lodz, Poland
[2] Copernicus Hosp Lodz, PL-93513 Lodz, Poland
关键词
Eye lens doses; Lower extremity doses; Leg doses; Occupational exposure; Interventional radiology; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; ORAMED PROJECT; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; MEDICAL STAFF; DOSIMETRY; CARDIOLOGY; EXTREMITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.01.006
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The study reports doses to eye lens and leg of physicians working in interventional radiology suites. The distributions of doses were measured and analysed in clinical conditions within the broad area from the left to the right side of the interventionalist's head at the level of eyebrows and the left ankle. These measurements were used to assay the doses to the interventionalist's eye lens and ankles. Additionally, the knee doses recorded during the ORAMED project were also reported for comparison. The measurements were performed in two interventional suites, both equipped with under-couch fluoroscopy systems with the lead curtain attached to the interventional table and ceiling shield; the latter, however, was not used. The data from a range of procedures, including embolisation (of abdominal aorta, carotids and brain), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and angioplasty (PTA) of lower limbs (LL), carotids and brain (C/B) were recorded. The doses measured at the level of eyebrows strongly depended on the location of dosimeter. The difference between doses measured near the left and right eye lens is about 80% of the highest dose (right or left). The 'best position' to place the eye lens dosimeter is the side of the eye closest to the X-ray tube; however, even in that case, the doses can still be underestimated up to 18% as the location corresponding to the maximum dose may vary from procedure to procedure due to different exposure conditions. Moreover, when comparing the doses on ankle and knee level, the former ones were higher than the latter for all types of procedures. The mean ratio is 2.1 for embolisation procedures, 2.4 for DSA/PTA LL and 1.3 for DSA/PTA C/B. The mean doses to eye lens are 0.108 mSv/procedure, 0.082 mSv/procedure and 0.027 mSv/procedure for embolisations, DSA/PTA LL and DSA/PTA C/B procedures, respectively, while the respective doses for the ankle are 0.047 mSv/procedure, 0.117 mSv/procedure and 0.042 mSv/procedure. The highest estimated annual eye lens and lower extremity doses were 26.5 mSv to the eye and 47.0 mSv to the ankle. These values do not exceed the existing annual limits. However, in the light of the recent recommendations of the ICRP concerning lower occupational limit to the lens of the eye of 20 mSv per annum, the monitoring of the eye lens seems to be very important. For one of the interventionalist included in the present study, this new limit is exceeded. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 66
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Radiation dose to physicians' eye lens during interventional radiology
    Bahruddin, N. A.
    Hashim, S.
    Karim, M. K. A.
    Sabarudin, A.
    Ang, W. C.
    Salehhon, N.
    Bakar, K. A.
    [J]. 13TH SOUTH-EAST ASIAN CONGRESS OF MEDICAL PHYSICS 2015 (SEACOMP), 2016, 694
  • [2] Staff eye lens dose in interventional radiology and cardiology in Finland
    Pekkarinen, Antti
    Lindholm, Carita
    Kortesniemi, Mika
    Siiskonen, Teemu
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 98 : 1 - 7
  • [3] Eye Lens Radiation Dose to Nurses during Cardiac Interventional Radiology: An Initial Study
    Yamada, Ayumi
    Haga, Yoshihiro
    Sota, Masahiro
    Abe, Mitsuya
    Kaga, Yuji
    Inaba, Yohei
    Suzuki, Masatoshi
    Tada, Norio
    Zuguchi, Masayuki
    Chida, Koichi
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (18)
  • [4] Occupational radiation dose to the eye lens of physicians from departments of interventional radiology
    Lian, Meng-En
    Tsai, Yuan-Hsiung
    Li, I-Gung
    Hong, Yu-Han
    Chang, Szu-Li
    Tsai, Hui-Yu
    [J]. RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2020, 132 (132)
  • [5] Surgeon eye lens dose monitoring in interventional neuroradiology, cardiovascular and radiology procedures
    Busoni, S.
    Bruzzi, M.
    Giomi, S.
    Poggiali, C.
    Quattrocchi, M.
    Betti, M.
    D'Urso, D.
    Fedeli, L.
    Mazzoni, L. N.
    Paolucci, M.
    Rossi, F.
    Taddeucci, A.
    Bettarini, S.
    Tortoli, P.
    Belli, G.
    Bernardi, L.
    Gasperi, C.
    Campanella, F.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 104 : 123 - 128
  • [6] Assessment of the occupational eye lens dose for clinical staff in interventional radiology, cardiology and neuroradiology
    Omar, Artur
    Kadesjo, Nils
    Palmgren, Charlotta
    Marteinsdottir, Maria
    Segerdahl, Tony
    Fransson, Annette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2017, 37 (01) : 145 - 159
  • [7] A correlation study of eye lens dose and personal dose equivalent for interventional cardiologists
    Farah, J.
    Struelens, L.
    Dabin, J.
    Koukorava, C.
    Donadille, L.
    Jacob, S.
    Schnelzer, M.
    Auvinen, A.
    Vanhavere, F.
    Clairand, I.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2013, 157 (04) : 561 - 569
  • [8] Evaluation of the dose dependence on the eye lens from the position of the dosimeter for the operators exposed in interventional radiology
    Liverani, A.
    Loffredo, F.
    Fiore, F.
    Correra, M.
    La Verde, G.
    Pugliese, M.
    [J]. NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2018, 41 (06):
  • [9] A method to reduce patient's eye lens dose in neuro-interventional radiology procedures
    Safari, M. J.
    Wong, J. H. D.
    Kadir, K. A. A.
    Sani, F. M.
    Ng, K. H.
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2016, 125 : 75 - 81
  • [10] OCCUPATIONAL EYE LENS DOSE ESTIMATED USING WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETER IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY: A MONTE CARLO STUDY
    Bozovic, Predrag
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera
    Petrovic, Jelena Stankovic
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2019, 185 (02) : 135 - 142