Resolving the reactive power question

被引：4
|
作者：
Kirkham, Harold [1 ]
Emanuel, Alexander [2 ]
Albu, Mihaela [3 ]
Laverty, David [4 ]
机构：
[1] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[2] Worcester Polytech Inst, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[3] Polytehn Univ, Bucharest, Romania
[4] Queens Univ, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
来源：
2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (I2MTC) | 2019年
关键词：
Reactive power; measurement; mistakes; definitions; Budeanu; power factor; measurement theory; BUDEANU;
D O I：
10.1109/i2mtc.2019.8826915
中图分类号：
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号：
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要：
The definition and measurement of reactive power has been the subject of a sometimes acrimonious debate. In this paper, a number of factors leading to the present situation are exposed by reviewing the history of the matter. The contributions of Poynting (1884), Steinmetz (1892), Lyon (1920) and Budeanu (1927) are examined. It is shown that much of the debate about reactive power is founded on two fundamental and yet unrecognized mistakes made over a hundred years ago. Further debate is unwarranted because of those early mistakes, and because in the light of modern measurement theory, the character and meaning of the measurement is changed. Reactive power has been and continues to be a useful concept, its definition matters: the automation of the power system demands a solution. Some suggestions are offered.
引用
收藏
页码：688 / 693
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
12345