Comparison of test methods for measuring water absorption and transport test methods of fabrics

被引:11
|
作者
Tang, Ka-Po Maggie [1 ]
Kan, Chi-wai [2 ]
Fan, Jin-tu [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Coll Human Ecol, Dept Fiber Sci & Apparel Design, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Inst Text & Clothing, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Water absorption; Water transport; Wetness sensation; Test methods; Forced Flow Water Transport Tester; Spontaneous Uptake Water Transport Tester; COTTON; TRANSPLANAR; PERCEPTION; ASSEMBLIES; CELLULOSE; TEXTILES; BEHAVIOR; IMPROVE; FIBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2016.10.054
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Water absorption and transport property is a crucial factor affecting the wear comfort. In the textile industry, there are a variety of test methods varying in construction mechanism, amount of water supplied and measurement parameters. In this work, the water absorption and transport properties of fabrics with different geometry and hydrophilicity were characterized by five conventional test methods and two recently developed water transport testers: Spontaneous Uptake Water Transport Tester (SUWTT) and Forced Flow Water Transport Tester (FFWTT). Testing principle of these methods is briefly outlined while their accuracy, efficiency, versatility, reproducibility, sensitivity and validity are systematically compared. The results suggest that FFWTT and SUWTT have superior performance in terms of information provided, testing duration, reproducibility, sensitivity and validity to subjective wetness sensation. In brief, this study helps fabric engineers or hygiene product developers to choose the most suitable water absorption and transport test method when developing new products. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COMPARISON OF TEAR TEST METHODS
    WARHURST, DM
    SLADE, JC
    OCHILTREE, BC
    POLYMER TESTING, 1986, 6 (06) : 463 - 480
  • [22] COMPARISON OF TRACKING TEST METHODS
    KURTZ, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL INSULATION, 1971, EI 6 (02): : 76 - &
  • [23] COMPARISON OF LEACH TEST METHODS
    LIVSHITZ, E
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1982, 41 : 112 - 113
  • [24] Comparison of sticky test methods
    Putz, HJ
    Hamann, A
    WOCHENBLATT FUR PAPIERFABRIKATION, 2003, 131 (05): : 218 - 225
  • [25] The value of absorption methods in the Wassermann test
    Bailey, CH
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1912, 9 (05) : 551 - 556
  • [26] Comparison of test methods for measuring the net buoyant force of buoyant materials
    Li, Nga-wun
    Ho, Chu-po
    Yick, Kit-lun
    Zhou, Jin-yun
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF TEXTILE AND APPAREL, 2020, 24 (02) : 147 - 161
  • [27] A COMPARISON OF THE VACUUM AND BOILING METHODS FOR MEASURING THE WATER-ABSORPTION OF BRICKS
    PEAKE, F
    FORD, RW
    TRANSACTIONS AND JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1982, 81 (05): : 160 - 162
  • [28] A Review of the Electrical Conductivity Test Methods for Conductive Fabrics
    Xie, Zeyue
    Ventura, Heura
    Ardanuy, Monica
    TEXTILES, 2024, 4 (03): : 284 - 308
  • [29] Measuring and testing. Test methods compared - 2. Suitable combinations of test methods
    Messen & testen. Prüfmethoden im vergleich. Teil 2: Geeignete kombinationen von testverfahren
    Berger, M., 2005, Carl Hanser Verlag (113):
  • [30] A review on test methods for insecticidal fabrics and the need for standardisation
    Reji Gopalakrishnan
    D. Sukumaran
    Vikas B. Thakare
    Prabhat Garg
    Ram Singh
    Parasitology Research, 2018, 117 : 3067 - 3080