Voters' power in voting games with abstention: Influence relation and ordinal equivalence of power theories

被引:35
|
作者
Tchantcho, Bertrand [2 ]
Lambo, Lawrence Diffo [2 ]
Pongou, Roland [1 ]
Engoulou, Bertrand Mbama [2 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Econ, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Univ Yaounde, Adv Teachers Training Coll, Dept Math, Yaounde, Cameroon
关键词
voting games with abstention; influence relation; equitableness; ordinal equivalence theorem;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2007.10.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The influence relation was introduced by Isbell [Isbell, J.R.. 1958. A class of simple games. Duke Math.. 25, 423-439] to qualitatively compare the a priori influence of voters in a simple game, which by construction allows only "yes" and "no" votes. We extend this relation to voting games with abstention (VGAs), in which abstention is permitted as an intermediate option between a "yes" and a "no" vote. Unlike in simple games, this relation is not a preorder in VGAs in general. It is not complete either, but we characterize VGAs for which it is complete, and show that it is a preorder whenever it is complete. We also compare (lie influence relation with recent generalizations to VGAs of the Shapley-Shubik and Banzhaf-Coleman power indices [Felsenthal. D.S., Machover, M., 1997. Ternary voting games. Int. J. Game Theory 26, 33535 1; Freixas, J., 2005a. The Shapley-Shubik power index for games with several levels of approval in the input and Output. Dec. Support Systems 39, 185-195; Freixas, J., 2005b. The Banzhaf index for games with several levels of approval in the input and Output. Ann. Operations Res. 137, 45-66]. For weakly equitable VGAs, the influence relation is a subset of the preorderings defined by these two power theories. We characterize VGA,; for which the three relations are equivalent. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 350
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the ordinal equivalence of the Johnston, Banzhaf and Shapley power indices
    Freixas, Josep
    Marciniak, Dorota
    Pons, Montserrat
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 216 (02) : 367 - 375
  • [22] Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing
    Adams, James
    PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2010, 8 (04) : 1257 - 1258
  • [23] Measuring voting power for dependent voters through causal models
    Bovens, Luc
    Beisbart, Claus
    SYNTHESE, 2011, 179 : 35 - 56
  • [24] Measuring voting power for dependent voters through causal models
    Luc Bovens
    Claus Beisbart
    Synthese, 2011, 179 : 35 - 56
  • [25] Average weights and power in weighted voting games
    Boratyn, Daria
    Kirsch, Werner
    Slomczynski, Wojciech
    Stolicki, Dariusz
    Zyczkowski, Karol
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2020, 108 : 90 - 99
  • [26] Computing power indices for large voting games
    Leech, D
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (06) : 831 - 838
  • [27] BRIBES, POWER, AND MANAGERIAL CONTROL IN CORPORATE VOTING GAMES
    JARROW, RA
    LEACH, JC
    THEORY AND DECISION, 1989, 26 (03) : 235 - 251
  • [28] Harsanyi power solutions for cooperative games on voting structures
    Algaba, Encarnacion
    Beal, Sylvain
    Remila, Eric
    Solal, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 48 (06) : 575 - 602
  • [29] Monotonicity of power in weighted voting games with restricted communication
    Napel, Stefan
    Nohn, Andreas
    Maria Alonso-Meijide, Jose
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2012, 64 (03) : 247 - 257
  • [30] Influence relation in two-output multichoice voting games
    Siani, Joseph
    Tedjeugang, Narcisse
    Tchantcho, Bertrand
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2023, 142 : 879 - 895