No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples

被引:76
|
作者
Lefevre, Carmen E. [1 ]
Lewis, Gary J. [2 ]
Bates, Timothy C. [3 ]
Dzhelyova, Milena [1 ]
Coetzee, Vinet [4 ]
Deary, Ian J. [3 ]
Perrett, David I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Psychol, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Sage Ctr Study Mind, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Pretoria, Dept Genet, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Facial width-to-height ratio; Facial structure; Sexual dimorphism; Facial metrics; Masculinity; BMI; AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR; ATTRACTIVENESS; SELECTION; CUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.03.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sexual dimorphism in physical appearance may be an important cue in both intra- and intersex competition. Recently, the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) has been proposed as a novel sexually dimorphic morphologic measure, with men suggested to have a higher fWEIR than women. Currently, however, the status of fWHR as a sexually dimorphic trait is unclear. Here we tested for sexual dimorphism in fWHR, as well as in three additional, previously reported facial measures, in four (three Caucasian and one African) independent samples. In three of the four samples, no significant sex differences in fWHR were observed. In one sample, males showed a significantly lower (rather than higher) fWHR than females (this effect was no longer significant after controlling for body mass index). By contrast, significant and large sex differences were observed in all four samples for each of the three previously validated facial metrics, namely, (a) lower face/face height, (b) cheekbone prominence, and (c) face width/lower face height. These results provide strong evidence against the claim that fWHR, at least as measured from the surface of the face, is sexually dimorphic. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 627
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response: Commentary: Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels
    Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.
    Sobraske, Katherine N. H.
    Samore, Theodore
    Gurven, Michael
    Gaulin, Steven J. C.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [42] Men's Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Aggression: A Meta-Analysis
    Haselhuhn, Michael P.
    Ormiston, Margaret E.
    Wong, Elaine M.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [43] Do Alpha Males Deliver Alpha? Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and Hedge Funds
    Lu, Yan
    Teo, Melvyn
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2022, 57 (05) : 1727 - 1770
  • [44] Facial width-to-height ratio in a Turkish population is not sexually dimorphic and is unrelated to aggressive behavior
    Ozener, Baris
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 33 (03) : 169 - 173
  • [45] The face of the brand: Spokesperson facial width-to-height ratio predicts brand personality judgments
    Deska, Jason C.
    Hingston, Sean T.
    DelVecchio, Devon
    Stenstrom, Eric P.
    Walker, Ryan J.
    Hugenberg, Kurt
    PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2022, 39 (08) : 1487 - 1503
  • [46] The Association Between Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR) and Sporting Performances: Evidence From Professional Basketball Players in Japan
    Sato, Shintaro
    Kinoshita, Keita
    Sekino, Koichi
    Amano, Haruka
    Bizen, Yoshifumi
    Matsuoka, Hirotaka
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [47] Does the facial width-to-height ratio map onto variability in men's testosterone concentrations?
    Bird, Brian M.
    Cid Jofre, Valeska S.
    Geniole, Shawn N.
    Welker, Keith M.
    Zilioli, Samuele
    Maestripieri, Dario
    Arnocky, Steven
    Carre, Justin M.
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 37 (05) : 392 - 398
  • [48] A Case of Evolutionary Mismatch? Why Facial Width-to-Height Ratio May Not Predict Behavioral Tendencies
    Wang, Dawei
    Nair, Krishnan
    Kouchaki, Maryam
    Zajac, Edward J.
    Zhao, Xiuxi
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (07) : 1074 - 1081
  • [49] The Face of Fear and Anger: Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Biases Recognition of Angry and Fearful Expressions
    Deska, Jason C.
    Lloyd, E. Paige
    Hugenberg, Kurt
    EMOTION, 2018, 18 (03) : 453 - 464
  • [50] Facial width-to-height ratio differs by social rank across organizations, countries, and value systems
    Hahn, Tim
    Winter, Nils R.
    Anderl, Christine
    Notebaert, Karolien
    Wuttke, Alina Marie
    Clement, Celina Chantal
    Windmann, Sabine
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (11):