No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples

被引:76
|
作者
Lefevre, Carmen E. [1 ]
Lewis, Gary J. [2 ]
Bates, Timothy C. [3 ]
Dzhelyova, Milena [1 ]
Coetzee, Vinet [4 ]
Deary, Ian J. [3 ]
Perrett, David I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Psychol, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Sage Ctr Study Mind, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[4] Univ Pretoria, Dept Genet, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Facial width-to-height ratio; Facial structure; Sexual dimorphism; Facial metrics; Masculinity; BMI; AGGRESSIVE-BEHAVIOR; ATTRACTIVENESS; SELECTION; CUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.03.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sexual dimorphism in physical appearance may be an important cue in both intra- and intersex competition. Recently, the facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) has been proposed as a novel sexually dimorphic morphologic measure, with men suggested to have a higher fWEIR than women. Currently, however, the status of fWHR as a sexually dimorphic trait is unclear. Here we tested for sexual dimorphism in fWHR, as well as in three additional, previously reported facial measures, in four (three Caucasian and one African) independent samples. In three of the four samples, no significant sex differences in fWHR were observed. In one sample, males showed a significantly lower (rather than higher) fWHR than females (this effect was no longer significant after controlling for body mass index). By contrast, significant and large sex differences were observed in all four samples for each of the three previously validated facial metrics, namely, (a) lower face/face height, (b) cheekbone prominence, and (c) face width/lower face height. These results provide strong evidence against the claim that fWHR, at least as measured from the surface of the face, is sexually dimorphic. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 627
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness
    Summersby, Stephanie
    Harris, Bonnie
    Denson, Thomas F.
    White, David
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (05):
  • [2] Is Male Facial Width-to-Height Ratio the Target of Sexual Selection?
    Barnaby J. W. Dixson
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2018, 47 : 827 - 828
  • [3] Is Male Facial Width-to-Height Ratio the Target of Sexual Selection?
    Dixson, Barnaby J. W.
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 47 (04) : 827 - 828
  • [4] Sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in human skulls and faces: A meta-analytical approach
    Kramer, Robin S. S.
    EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 38 (03) : 414 - 420
  • [5] No evidence that facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is associated with women's sexual desire
    Zhang, Weiqing
    Hahn, Amanda C.
    Cai, Ziyi
    Lee, Anthony J.
    Holzleitner, Iris J.
    DeBruine, Lisa M.
    Jones, Benedict C.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [6] Commentary: Sexual Dimorphism of Facial Width-to-Height Ratio in Human Skulls and Faces: A Meta-Analytical Approach
    Koellner, Martin G.
    Janson, Kevin T.
    Schultheiss, Oliver C.
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [7] Automatic processing of facial width-to-height ratio
    Wang Hailing
    Chen Enguang
    Lian Yujing
    Li Jingjing
    Wang Liwei
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2023, 55 (11) : 1745 - 1761
  • [8] Facial Width-to-Height Ratio in a Large Sample of Commonwealth Games Athletes
    Kramer, Robin S. S.
    EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 13 (01): : 197 - 209
  • [9] Facial width-to-height ratio and celebrity endorsements
    Huh, HaengRyang
    Yi, DongSoo
    Zhu, HongYang
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 68 : 43 - 47
  • [10] Politicians' Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and their Electoral Success
    Banai, Irena Pavela
    Banai, Benjamin
    Mavar, Mladen
    PSIHOLOGIJSKE TEME, 2020, 29 (03): : 589 - 606