Priority setting for health in emerging markets

被引:1
|
作者
Glassman, Amanda [1 ]
Giedion, Ursula
McQueston, Kate [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Global Dev, Washington, DC 20036 USA
关键词
comparative effectiveness; cost-effectiveness; health technology assessment; low-income country; middle-income country; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION RESEARCH; DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES; COVERAGE DECISIONS; STATE;
D O I
10.2217/CER.13.12
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The use of health technology assessment research in emerging economies is becoming an increasingly important tool to determine the uses of health spending. As low- and middle-income countries' gross domestic product grows, the funding available for health has increased in tandem. There' is growing evidence that comparative effectiveness research and cost-effectiveness can be used to improve health outcomes within a predefined financial space. The use of these evaluation tools, combined with a systematized process of priority setting, can help inform national and global health payers. This review of country institutions for health technology assessment illustrates two points: the efforts underway to use research to inform priorities are widespread and not confined to wealthier countries; and many countries' efforts to create evidence-based policy are incomplete and more country-specific research will be needed. Further evidence shows that there is scope to reduce these gaps and opportunity to support better incorporation of data through better-defined priority-setting processes.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 291
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Priority setting in Indigenous health: assessing priority setting process and criteria that should guide the health system to improve Indigenous Australian health
    Otim, Michael E.
    Kelaher, Margaret
    Anderson, Ian P.
    Doran, Chris M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2014, 13
  • [22] Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH
    Husereau, Don
    Boucher, Michel
    Noorani, Hussein
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 26 (03) : 341 - 347
  • [23] The Next Wave in Health Care Priority Setting
    Rid, Annette
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2018, 48 (04) : insidefrontcover
  • [24] Key Concepts in Health Care Priority Setting
    Rogeer Hoedemaekers
    Wim Dekkers
    Health Care Analysis, 2003, 11 : 309 - 323
  • [25] Evidence based priority setting for health systems
    Rajan, A.
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2009, 14 : 112 - 112
  • [26] RATIONAL APPROACHES TO PRIORITY SETTING IN INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
    MURRAY, CJL
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1990, 93 (05): : 303 - 311
  • [27] Ethical basis of priority setting in health care
    Marckmann, G.
    BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLATT-GESUNDHEITSFORSCHUNG-GESUNDHEITSSCHUTZ, 2010, 53 (09) : 867 - 873
  • [28] Priority setting with Health Inequality Impact Assessment
    Lester, C
    Griffiths, S
    Smith, K
    Lowe, G
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 115 (04) : 272 - 276
  • [29] Distributive Justice and Priority Setting in Health Care
    Wilson, Yolonda Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (03): : 53 - 54
  • [30] Priority setting for mental health research in Chile
    Zitko, Pedro
    Borghero, Francesca
    Zavala, Cynthia
    Markkula, Niina
    Santelices, Emilio
    Libuy, Nicolas
    Pemjean, Alfredo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2017, 11