Evaluation of progressive collapse potential of multi-story moment resisting steel frame buildings under lateral loading

被引:31
|
作者
Tavakoli, H. R. [1 ]
Alashti, A. Rashidi [1 ]
机构
[1] Babol Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Babol Sar, Iran
关键词
Progressive collapse; 3-D push-over analysis; Moment resistance frame; Alternate load path;
D O I
10.1016/j.scient.2012.12.008
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to investigate whether MRF steel structures that have been designed based on seismic codes, are able to resist progressive collapse with damaged columns in different locations under seismic loading. For this purpose, 3-D and 2-D push-over analysis of structures is carried out. The progressive collapse potential has been assessed in connection with 5 and 15-story buildings with 4 and 6 bays by applying the alternate load path method recommended in UFC guidelines. Member removal in this manner is intended to represent a situation where an extreme event, such as vehicle impact or past earthquake shock or construction error, may cause a critical column, as a result of local or global buckling, to lose a part or whole of its load bearing capacity. In contrast with 3-D models, two-dimensional frames represent a higher sensitivity to base shear reduction and element removal. In the case of middle column removal, the structure is more robust than in a corner column removal situation. The influence of story number, redundancy and location of critical eliminated elements has been discussed. (C) 2013 Sharif University of Technology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Experimental Investigation of the Progressive Collapse of a Steel Special Moment-Resisting Frame and a Post-tensioned Energy-Dissipating Frame
    Tsitos, Antonios
    Mosqueda, Gilberto
    ROLE OF SEISMIC TESTING FACILITIES IN PERFORMANCE-BASED EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2012, 22 : 367 - 382
  • [42] Numerical investigation of steel moment resisting frames with reduced Cross-Section under progressive collapse
    Ali, Mubashir
    Bavukkatt, Rajeevan
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 65 : 824 - 830
  • [43] EVALUATION OF PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE POTENTIAL OF STEEL MOMENT FRAMES CONSIDERING CATENARY ACTION
    Kim, Jinkoo
    An, Dawoon
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2009, 18 (04): : 455 - 465
  • [44] Numerical Simulation of a Reduced-Scale 4-Story Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Tested to Collapse
    Li, Jionghui
    Somarriba, Martin
    Okazaki, Taichiro
    Nagae, Takuya
    Matsui, Ryota
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2024 - VOL 1, 2024, 519 : 880 - 889
  • [45] Collapse mechanisms of multi-story steel-framed modular structures under fire scenarios
    Shan, Sidi
    Pan, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2022, 196
  • [46] Estimation of ultimate seismic capacity and column demand of multi-story steel moment resisting frames with new column support system to fishbone-shaped frame
    Kimura, Yoshihiro
    Kaneda, Katsunori
    Wada, Akira
    Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 2012, 77 (675): : 765 - 773
  • [47] Energy-based pulldown analysis for assessing the progressive collapse potential of steel frame buildings
    Liu, Min
    Pirmoz, Akbar
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 123 : 372 - 378
  • [48] Proposal of new column support system for multi-story steel moment resisting structures to perform beam yielding mechanism
    Kaneda K.
    Kimura Y.
    Hamasaki S.
    Wada A.
    Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 2010, 75 (654): : 1537 - 1546
  • [49] Evaluation method for multi-story buildings influenced by under-crossing metro tunnel
    Heng, Chao-Yang
    Teng, Yan-Jing
    Sun, Xi-Yuan
    Zhou, Zhi
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37 : 148 - 152
  • [50] Evaluation of proper supplemental damping for a multi-story steel frame using capacity spectrum method
    Choi, HH
    Kim, J
    EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT ENGINEERING STRUCTURES III, 2001, 9 : 25 - 34