Postmortem study of organ-specific toxicity in glioblastoma patients treated with a combination of temozolomide, irinotecan and bevacizumab

被引:3
|
作者
Lu, Guangrong [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Ping [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Rao, Mayank [1 ,2 ]
Linendoll, Nadine [3 ]
Buja, L. Maximilian [4 ]
Bhattacharjee, Meenakshi B. [4 ]
Brown, Robert E. [4 ]
Ballester, Leomar Y. [2 ,4 ]
Tian, Xuejun [5 ,9 ]
Pilichowska, Monika [5 ]
Wu, Julian K. [6 ]
Hergenroeder, Georgene W. [1 ,2 ]
Glass, Williams F. [4 ]
Chen, Lei [4 ]
Zhang, Rongzhen [4 ]
Pillai, Anil K. [7 ]
Hunter, Robert L. [4 ]
Zhu, Jay-Jiguang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Vivian L Smith Dept Neurosurg, 6400 Fannin St,Suite 2800, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Mem Hermann Hosp, Texas Med Ctr, 6400 Fannin St,Suite 2800, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Hematol Oncol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] UTHlth McGovern Med Sch, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[7] UTHlth McGovern Med Sch, Diagnost Intervent Imaging, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[8] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurosurg, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[9] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
Autopsy; Postmortem; End-organ toxicity; Chemotherapy; Temozolomide; Irinotecan; Bevacizumab; Glioblastoma (GBM); Glioma; Myelosuppression; Brain metastasis; RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA; THERAPY; GLIOMAS; DEATH; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-022-04144-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Systemic chemotherapy including monotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ) or bevacizumab (BEV); two-drug combinations, such as irinotecan (IRI) and BEV, TMZ and BEV and a three-drug combination with TMZ, IRI and BEV (TIB) have been used in treating patients with progressive high-grade gliomas including glioblastoma (GBM). Most patients tolerated these regimens well with known side effects of hypertension, proteinuria, and reversible clinical myelosuppression (CM). However, organ- or system- specific toxicities from chemotherapy agents have never been examined by postmortem study. This is the largest cohort used to address this issue in glioma patients. Methods Postmortem tissues (from all major systems and organs) were prospectively collected and examined by standard institution autopsy and neuropathological procedures from 76 subjects, including gliomas (N = 68, 44/M, and 24/F) and brain metastases (N = 8, 5/M, and 3/F) between 2009 and 2019. Standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) were performed on all major organs including brain specimens. Electronic microscopic (EM) study was carried out on 14 selected subject's kidney samples per standard EM protocol. Medical records were reviewed with adverse events (AEs) analyzed and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03. A swimmer plot was utilized to visualize the timelines of patient history by treatment group. The binary logistic regression models were performed to explore any associations between treatment strategies and incident myelosuppression. Results Twenty-four glioma subjects were treated with TIB [median: 5.5 (range: 1-25) cycles] at tumor recurrence. Exposure to IRI significantly increased the frequency of CM (p = 0.05). No unexpected adverse events clinically, or permanent end-organ damage during postmortem examination was identified in glioma subjects who had received standard or prolonged duration of BEV, TMZ or TIB regimen-based chemotherapies except rare events of bone marrow suppression. The most common causes of death (COD) were tumor progression (63.2%, N = 43) followed by aspiration pneumonia (48.5%, N = 33) in glioma subjects. No COD was attributed to acute toxicity from TIB. The study also demonstrated that postmortem kidney specimen is unsuitable for studying renal ultrastructural pathological changes due to autolysis. Conclusion There is no organ or system toxicity by postmortem examinations among glioma subjects who received BEV, TMZ or TIB regimen-based chemotherapies regardless of durations except for occasional bone marrow suppression and reversible myelosuppression clinically. IRI, but not the extended use of TMZ, significantly increased CM in recurrent glioma patients. COD most commonly resulted from glioma tumor progression with infiltration to brain stem and aspiration pneumonia.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 231
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiographic evaluation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan
    Andre, J.
    Spearman, K.
    Lu, S.
    Hwang, S.
    Dorsett, L.
    Raval, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [22] Radiographic evaluation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (gbm) in patients treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan
    Andre, Jalal
    Spearman, Kenneth
    Lu, Stanley
    Raval, Sumul
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 9 (04) : 575 - 575
  • [23] Phase II study of the combination of bevacizumab plus irinotecan and temozolomide for relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma (NB).
    Modak, Shakeel
    Kushner, Brian H.
    Kramer, Kim
    Leyco, Samantha
    Basu, Ellen M.
    Roberts, Stephen S.
    Cheung, Nai-Kong V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [24] A PHASE II STUDY OF TUMOR TREATING FIELDS IN COMBINATION WITH BEVACIZUMAB AND TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED, UNRESECTABLE GLIOBLASTOMA
    Sumrall, Ashley
    Haggstrom, Daniel
    Burri, Stuart
    Symanowski, James
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 19 : 16 - 16
  • [25] SURVIVAL AND EFFICACY DATA FOR PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA TREATED WITH IPILIMUMAB IN COMBINATION WITH BEVACIZUMAB
    Carter, Thomas
    Brown, Nicholas
    Shaw, Heather
    Chester, Kerry
    Cohn-Brown, Denise
    Mulholland, Paul
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 19 - 19
  • [26] Cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan for patients with primary glioblastoma and progression after radiation therapy and temozolomide: a phase II trial
    Hasselbalch, Benedikte
    Lassen, Ulrik
    Hansen, Steinbjorn
    Holmberg, Mats
    Sorensen, Morten
    Kosteljanetz, Michael
    Broholm, Helle
    Stockhausen, Marie-Therese
    Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2010, 12 (05) : 508 - 516
  • [27] Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and irinotecan versus bevacizumab and temozolomide followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: A randomized phase II study
    Hofland, Kenneth F.
    Hansen, Steinbjorn
    Sorensen, Morten
    Engelholm, Silke
    Schultz, Henrik P.
    Muhic, Aida
    Grunnet, Kirsten
    Ask, Anders
    Costa, Junia C.
    Kristiansen, Charlotte
    Thomsen, Carsten
    Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard
    Lassen, Ulrik
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2014, 53 (07) : 939 - 944
  • [28] PHASE II STUDY OF THE COMBINATION OF BEVACIZUMAB PLUS IRINOTECAN AND TEMOZOLOMIDE FOR RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY NEUROBLASTOMA: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
    Modak, Shakeel
    Kushner, Brian H.
    Kramer, Kim
    Basu, Ellen
    Roberts, Stephen S.
    Cheung, Nai-Kong V.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2012, 59 (06) : 1057 - 1057
  • [29] A meta-analysis of bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme
    Zhang, Guobin
    Huang, Shengyue
    Wang, Zhongcheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (12) : 1636 - 1640
  • [30] A Review of Dose-dense Temozolomide Alone and in Combination with Bevacizumab in Patients with First Relapse of Glioblastoma
    Johansson, Fredrik
    Ekman, Simon
    Blomquist, Erik
    Henriksson, Roger
    Bergstrom, Stefan
    Bergqvist, Michael
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 32 (09) : 4001 - 4006