Evaluating rotational kinematics of the knee in ACL reconstructed patients using 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

被引:17
|
作者
Kothari, Abbas [1 ]
Haughom, Bryan [1 ]
Subburaj, Karupppasamy [1 ]
Feeley, Brian [1 ]
Li, Xiaojuan [1 ]
Ma, C. Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
来源
KNEE | 2012年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
Rotation; Stability; ACL; Kinematics; MRI; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; IN-VIVO; JOINT KINEMATICS; LAXITY; RELIABILITY; PLACEMENT; DEFICIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2011.12.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is common. While prior studies have shown that surgical reconstruction of the ACL can restore anterior-posterior kinematics, ACL-injured and reconstructed knees have been shown to have significant differences in tibial rotation when compared to uninjured knees. Our laboratory has developed an MR compatible rotational loading device to objectively quantify rotational stability of the knee following ACL injuries and reconstructions. Previous work from our group demonstrated a significant increase in total tibial rotation following ACL injuries. The current study is a prospective study on the same cohort of patients who have now undergone ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that ACL reconstructed knees will have less tibial rotation relative to the pre-operative ACL deficient condition. We also hypothesize that ACL reconstructed knees will have greater rotational laxity when compared to healthy contralateral knees. Methods: Patients. Six of the ACL injured patients from our initial study who had subsequently undergone ACL reconstruction were evaluated 8.1 +/- 2.9 months after surgery. All patients underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction using anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel with identical post-operative regimens. Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging. Patients were placed in a supine position in the MR scanner on a custom-built loading device. Once secured in the scanner bore, an internal/external torque was applied to the foot. The tibiae were semi-automatically segmented with in-house software. Tibial rotation comparisons were made within subjects (i.e. side-to-side comparison between reconstructed and contralateral knees) and differences were explored using paired sample t-tests with significance set at p = 0.05. Results: Regarding tibial rotation, in the ACL deficient state, these patients experienced an average of 5.9 +/- 4.1 degrees difference in tibial rotation between their ACL deficient and contralateral knees. However, there was a -0.2 +/- 6.1 degrees difference in tibial rotation of the ACL reconstructed knee when compared to the contralateral uninjured knee. Regarding tibial translation, ACL deficient patients showed a difference of 0.75 +/- 1.4mm of anterior tibial translation between injured and healthy knees. After ACL reconstruction, there was a 0.2 +/- 1.1mm difference in coupled anterior tibial translation of the ACL reconstructed knee compared to the contralateral knee. No significant differences in contact area between the two time points could be discemed. Discussion: The objective of our study was to assess the rotational laxity present in ACL reconstructed knees using a previously validated MRI-compatible rotational loading device. Our study demonstrated that ACL reconstruction can restore rotational laxity under load. This may speak to the benefit of an anteromedial drilling technique, which allows for a more horizontal and anatomically appropriate graft position. (C) 2011 Elsevier RV. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 651
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Acute Demyelinating Optic Neuritis
    Hur, Minjun
    Madhavan, Ajay A.
    Hodge, David O.
    Eckel, Laurence J.
    Pittock, Sean J.
    Flanagan, Eoin P.
    Bhatti, M. Tariq
    Chen, John J.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 42 (03) : 297 - 302
  • [32] 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail
    Nóra Lubina
    Ulla Schedelbeck
    Anne Roth
    Andreas Max Weng
    Eva Geissinger
    Arnd Hönig
    Dietbert Hahn
    Thorsten Alexander Bley
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 1285 - 1293
  • [33] Can magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0-Tesla reliably detect patients with endometriosis? Initial results
    Thomeer, Maarten G.
    Steensma, Anneke B.
    van Santbrink, Evert J.
    Willemssen, Francois E.
    Wielopolski, Piotr A.
    Hunink, Myriam G.
    Spronk, Sandra
    Laven, Joop S.
    Krestin, Gabriel P.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (04) : 1051 - 1058
  • [34] 3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail
    Lubina, Nora
    Schedelbeck, Ulla
    Roth, Anne
    Weng, Andreas Max
    Geissinger, Eva
    Hoenig, Arnd
    Hahn, Dietbert
    Bley, Thorsten Alexander
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (05) : 1285 - 1293
  • [35] Evaluating the Safety of Simultaneous Intracranial Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition Using a 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanner
    Fujita, Yuya
    Khoo, Hui Ming
    Hirayama, Miki
    Kawahara, Masaaki
    Koyama, Yoshihiro
    Tarewaki, Hiroyuki
    Arisawa, Atsuko
    Yanagisawa, Takufumi
    Tani, Naoki
    Oshino, Satoru
    Lemieux, Louis
    Kishima, Haruhiko
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [36] Assessment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Using Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter at 3.0 Tesla
    Uda, Takehiro
    Takami, Toshihiro
    Tsuyuguchi, Naohiro
    Sakamoto, Shinichi
    Yamagata, Toru
    Ikeda, Hidetoshi
    Nagata, Takashi
    Ohata, Kenji
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (05) : 407 - 414
  • [37] Knee joint cartilage injuries using magnetic resonance: advantages of using 3.0 Tesla proton density-weighted sequences
    Crespo Villalba, Francisco Jose
    IMAGEN DIAGNOSTICA, 2011, 2 (02): : 53 - 58
  • [38] Optimising magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging and surgical planning in colon cancer at 1.5 tesla and 3.0 tesla
    Hunter, C. J.
    Scurr, E.
    Jeyadevan, N.
    Collins, D. J.
    Abulafi, M.
    Tekkis, P. P.
    Georgiou, P. A.
    Leach, M. O.
    Brown, G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04)
  • [39] Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla detects more lesions in acute optic neuritis than at 1.5 tesla
    Nielsen, K
    Rostrup, E
    Frederiksen, JL
    Knudsen, S
    Mathiesen, HK
    Hanson, LG
    Paulson, OB
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 76 - 82
  • [40] Assessment of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in Madelung's deformity: findings and implications
    Ma, Yimin
    Guo, Zhe
    Wang, Ling
    Wang, Qianqian
    Cheng, Xiaoguang
    Yan, Dong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)