Evaluating rotational kinematics of the knee in ACL reconstructed patients using 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

被引:17
|
作者
Kothari, Abbas [1 ]
Haughom, Bryan [1 ]
Subburaj, Karupppasamy [1 ]
Feeley, Brian [1 ]
Li, Xiaojuan [1 ]
Ma, C. Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
来源
KNEE | 2012年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
Rotation; Stability; ACL; Kinematics; MRI; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; IN-VIVO; JOINT KINEMATICS; LAXITY; RELIABILITY; PLACEMENT; DEFICIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2011.12.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is common. While prior studies have shown that surgical reconstruction of the ACL can restore anterior-posterior kinematics, ACL-injured and reconstructed knees have been shown to have significant differences in tibial rotation when compared to uninjured knees. Our laboratory has developed an MR compatible rotational loading device to objectively quantify rotational stability of the knee following ACL injuries and reconstructions. Previous work from our group demonstrated a significant increase in total tibial rotation following ACL injuries. The current study is a prospective study on the same cohort of patients who have now undergone ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that ACL reconstructed knees will have less tibial rotation relative to the pre-operative ACL deficient condition. We also hypothesize that ACL reconstructed knees will have greater rotational laxity when compared to healthy contralateral knees. Methods: Patients. Six of the ACL injured patients from our initial study who had subsequently undergone ACL reconstruction were evaluated 8.1 +/- 2.9 months after surgery. All patients underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction using anteromedial portal drilling of the femoral tunnel with identical post-operative regimens. Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging. Patients were placed in a supine position in the MR scanner on a custom-built loading device. Once secured in the scanner bore, an internal/external torque was applied to the foot. The tibiae were semi-automatically segmented with in-house software. Tibial rotation comparisons were made within subjects (i.e. side-to-side comparison between reconstructed and contralateral knees) and differences were explored using paired sample t-tests with significance set at p = 0.05. Results: Regarding tibial rotation, in the ACL deficient state, these patients experienced an average of 5.9 +/- 4.1 degrees difference in tibial rotation between their ACL deficient and contralateral knees. However, there was a -0.2 +/- 6.1 degrees difference in tibial rotation of the ACL reconstructed knee when compared to the contralateral uninjured knee. Regarding tibial translation, ACL deficient patients showed a difference of 0.75 +/- 1.4mm of anterior tibial translation between injured and healthy knees. After ACL reconstruction, there was a 0.2 +/- 1.1mm difference in coupled anterior tibial translation of the ACL reconstructed knee compared to the contralateral knee. No significant differences in contact area between the two time points could be discemed. Discussion: The objective of our study was to assess the rotational laxity present in ACL reconstructed knees using a previously validated MRI-compatible rotational loading device. Our study demonstrated that ACL reconstruction can restore rotational laxity under load. This may speak to the benefit of an anteromedial drilling technique, which allows for a more horizontal and anatomically appropriate graft position. (C) 2011 Elsevier RV. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 651
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating rotational kinematics of the knee in ACL-ruptured and healthy patients using 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Bryan D. Haughom
    Richard Souza
    William W. Schairer
    Xiaojuan Li
    C. Benjamin Ma
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012, 20 : 663 - 670
  • [2] Evaluating rotational kinematics of the knee in ACL-ruptured and healthy patients using 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Haughom, Bryan D.
    Souza, Richard
    Schairer, William W.
    Li, Xiaojuan
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2012, 20 (04) : 663 - 670
  • [3] Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla
    Scarabino, T
    Nemore, F
    Giannatempo, GM
    Maiorana, A
    Di Salle, F
    Bertolino, A
    Tedeschi, G
    Salvolini, U
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2003, 16 : 314 - 315
  • [4] A New Device for Measuring Knee Rotational Kinematics Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Carpenter, R. Dana
    Shefelbine, Sandra J.
    Lozano, Jesus
    Carballido-Gamio, Julio
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL DEVICES-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2008, 2 (04):
  • [5] Bone marrow quantification using 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Bernard, C. P.
    Liney, G. P.
    Manton, D. J.
    Turnbull, L. W.
    Langton, C. M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 (07) : 1140 - 1140
  • [6] ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC 3.0 TESLA MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Park, Bong Hee
    Jang, HyunJun
    Song, Wan
    Jeong, WooSuk
    Seo, YounSuk
    Choo, Seol Ho
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Ryu, Dong Soo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E228 - E228
  • [7] Cerebral small vessel disease is detectable on 3.0 TESLA magnetic resonance imaging: Established 3.0 TESLA magnetic resonance imaging first time in Mongolia
    Ochirkhuu, Odgerel
    Enkhbat, Tungalag
    Purev, Dulamragchaa
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429
  • [8] 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: A new standard in liver imaging?
    Girometti, Rossano
    WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 7 (15) : 1894 - 1898
  • [9] 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: A new standard in liver imaging?
    Rossano Girometti
    World Journal of Hepatology, 2015, (15) : 1894 - 1898
  • [10] Vulnerable plaque detection by 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Cury, RC
    Houser, SL
    Furie, KL
    Stone, JR
    Ogilvy, CS
    Sherwood, JB
    Muller, JE
    Brady, TJ
    Hinton, DP
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 112 - 115