LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH A REMOTE CONTROLLED ROBOT

被引:10
|
作者
Abbou, Clement-Claude [1 ]
Hoznek, Andras [1 ]
Salomon, Laurent [1 ]
Olsson, Leif Eric [1 ]
Lobontiu, Adrian [1 ]
Saint, Fabien [1 ]
Cicco, Antony [1 ]
Antiphon, Patrick [1 ]
Chopin, Dominique [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Henri Mondor, Serv Urol, Creteil, France
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2017年 / 197卷 / 02期
关键词
robotics; feasibility studies; laparoscopy; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Robotics in surgery is a recent innovation. This technology offers a number of attractive features in laparoscopy. It overcomes the difficulties with fixed port sites by restoring all 6 degrees of freedom at the instrument tips, provides new possibilities for miniaturization of surgical tasks and allows remote controlled surgery. We investigated the applicability of remote controlled robotic surgery to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Our previous experience with laparoscopic prostatectomy served as a basis for adapting robotic surgery to this procedure. A surgeon at a different location who activated the tele-manipulators of the da Vinci* robotic system performed all steps of the intervention. A scrub nurse and second surgeon who stood at patient side had limited roles to port and instrument placement, exposure of the operative field, assistance in hemostasis and removal of the operative specimen. Our patient was a 63-year-old man presenting with a T1c tumor discovered on 1 positive sextant biopsy with a 3+3 Gleason score and 7 ng./ml. preoperative serum prostate specific antigen. Results: The robot provided an ergonomic surgical environment and remarkable dexterity enhancement. Operating time was 420 minutes, and the hospital stay lasted 4 days. The bladder catheter was removed 3 days postoperatively, and 1 week later the patient was fully continent. Pathological examination showed a pT3a tumor with negative margins. Conclusions: Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible. This new technology enhances surgical dexterity. Further developments in this field may have new applications in laparoscopic tele-surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:S210 / S212
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Osmonov, Daniar K.
    Faddan, Amr A.
    Aksenov, Alexey V.
    Naumann, Carsten M.
    Rapoport, Leonid M.
    Bezrukov, Evgeny A.
    Tsarichenko, Dmitry G.
    Juenemann, Klaus P.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 44 (04): : 303 - 310
  • [42] A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    D'Alonzo, Richard C.
    Gan, Tong J.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Albala, David M.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Sun, Leon
    Dahm, Philipp
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2009, 21 (05) : 322 - 328
  • [43] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy in obese patients.
    Le, C. Q.
    Slezak, J. M.
    Ho, K. V.
    Gettman, M. T.
    Blute, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A224 - A224
  • [44] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of oncological outcomes at a single center
    Okegawa, Takatsugu
    Omura, Shota
    Samejima, Mio
    Ninomiya, Naoki
    Taguchi, Satoru
    Nakamura, Yu
    Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi
    Tambo, Mitsuhiro
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [45] Risk of hernia formation after radical prostatectomy: a comparison between open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within the prospectively controlled LAPPRO trial
    Nilsson, H.
    Stranne, J.
    Hugosson, J.
    Wessman, C.
    Steineck, G.
    Bjartell, A.
    Carlsson, S.
    Thorsteinsdottir, T.
    Tyritzis, S., I
    Lantz, A.
    Wiklund, P.
    Haglind, E.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (01) : 157 - 164
  • [46] Lower extremity neuropathy after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy
    Manny, Ted B.
    Gorbachinsky, Ilya
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 5390 - 5393
  • [47] Risk of hernia formation after radical prostatectomy: a comparison between open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy within the prospectively controlled LAPPRO trial
    H. Nilsson
    J. Stranne
    J. Hugosson
    C. Wessman
    G. Steineck
    A. Bjartell
    S. Carlsson
    T. Thorsteinsdottir
    S. I. Tyritzis
    A. Lantz
    P. Wiklund
    E. Haglind
    Hernia, 2022, 26 : 157 - 164
  • [48] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Hoznek A.
    Samadi D.B.
    Salomon L.
    Olsson L.E.
    Saint F.
    Chopin D.
    Abbou C.-C.
    Current Urology Reports, 2002, 3 (2) : 141 - 147
  • [49] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Krongrad A.
    Current Urology Reports, 2000, 1 (1) : 36 - 40
  • [50] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    高新
    邱剑光
    蔡育彬
    周祥福
    洪良庆
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2004, (01) : 149 - 150