Genetic Modulation of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Cognition

被引:37
|
作者
Wiegand, Ariane [1 ]
Nieratschker, Vanessa [1 ]
Plewnia, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Mol Psychiat, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Tubingen, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Neurophysiol & Intervent Neuropsychiat, Tubingen, Germany
来源
关键词
brain stimulation; cognition; BDNF; COMT; dopamine; neuroplasticity; stimulation genetics; tDCS; CATECHOL-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; BDNF VAL66MET POLYMORPHISM; COMT VAL/MET POLYMORPHISM; NEUROTROPHIC FACTOR; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; CORTICAL PLASTICITY; FUNCTIONAL POLYMORPHISM; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00651
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
High inter-individual variability substantially challenges the explanatory power of studies on the modulation of cognitive functions with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). These differences in responsivity have been linked with a critical state-dependency of stimulation effects. In general, genetic diversity is a decisive biological basis of variations in neuronal network functioning. Therefore, it is most likely that inter-individual variability of tDCS-induced changes in cognitive functions is due to specific interactions between genetically determined network properties and the specific type of stimulation. In this context, predominantly the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met and the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val108/158Met polymorphisms have been investigated. The studies on the interaction between the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and the effect of brain stimulation indicate a critical but yet heterogeneous interaction. But up to now, data on the interplay between this polymorphism and tDCS on cognitive functioning are not available. However, recently, the functional Val(108/158)Met polymorphism in the COMT gene, that is particularly involved in the regulation of executive functions by means of the dopaminergic tone in frontal brain areas, has been demonstrated to specifically predict the effect of tDCS on cognitive control. Following an inverted U-shaped function, the high dopaminergic activity in Met allele homozygous individuals has been shown to be associated with a reduction of executive functioning by anodal tDCS to the prefrontal cortex. Consistently, Val homozygous individuals with lower dopaminergic tone show a clear reduction of response inhibition with cathodal tDCS. These findings exemplify the notion of a complex but neurophysiologically consistent interaction between genetically determined variations of neuronal activity and tDCS, particularly in the cognitive domain. Consequently, a systematic analysis and consideration of genetic modulators of tDCS effects will be helpful to improve the efficacy of brain stimulation and particularly tDCS in the investigation and treatment of cognitive functions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Induction and modulation of neuroplasticity by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans
    Nitsche, MA
    Antal, A
    Liebetanz, D
    Lang, N
    Tergau, F
    Paulus, W
    KLINISCHE NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE, 2004, 35 (02) : 55 - 60
  • [22] Investigating the neural mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation effects on human cognition: current issues and potential solutions
    Meinzer, Marcus
    Shahbabaie, Alireza
    Antonenko, Daria
    Blankenburg, Felix
    Fischer, Rico
    Hartwigsen, Gesa
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Li, Shu-Chen
    Thielscher, Axel
    Timmann, Dagmar
    Waltemath, Dagmar
    Abdelmotaleb, Mohamed
    Kocatas, Harun
    Guevara, Leonardo M. Caisachana
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Grundei, Miro
    Cunha, Teresa
    Hayek, Dayana
    Turker, Sabrina
    Schlitt, Frederik
    Shi, Yiquan
    Khan, Asad
    Burke, Michael
    Riemann, Steffen
    Niemann, Filip
    Floeel, Agnes
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [23] Novel methods to optimize the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: a systematic review of transcranial direct current stimulation patents
    Malavera, Alejandra
    Vasquez, Alejandra
    Fregni, Felipe
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (06) : 679 - 688
  • [24] Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation in a genetic absence model
    Zobeiri, M.
    van Luijtelaar, G.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2013, 26 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [25] Subcortical effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in the rat
    Bolzoni, F.
    Baczyk, M.
    Jankowska, E.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2013, 591 (16): : 4027 - 4042
  • [26] The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pragmatic processing
    Osovlanski, Hagit
    Mashal, Nira
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2017, 44 : 239 - 248
  • [27] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects in Disorders of Consciousness
    Angelakis, Efthymios
    Liouta, Evangelia
    Andreadis, Nikos
    Korfias, Stephanos
    Ktonas, Periklis
    Stranjalis, George
    Sakas, Damianos E.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 95 (02): : 283 - 289
  • [28] Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Woods, Adam J.
    Bryant, Vaughn
    Sacchetti, Daniela
    Gervits, Felix
    Hamilton, Roy
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (03) : 515 - 519
  • [29] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on brain changes and relation to cognition in patients with schizophrenia: a fMRI study
    Yong Liu
    Hechun Li
    Wei Li
    Yiran Wang
    Jiangling Jiang
    Xinyi Cao
    Tianhong Zhang
    Yingying Tang
    Jijun Wang
    Dezhong Yao
    Cheng Luo
    Robert C. Smith
    Chunbo Li
    Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2022, 16 : 2061 - 2071
  • [30] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on brain changes and relation to cognition in patients with schizophrenia: a fMRI study
    Liu, Yong
    Li, Hechun
    Li, Wei
    Wang, Yiran
    Jiang, Jiangling
    Cao, Xinyi
    Zhang, Tianhong
    Tang, Yingying
    Wang, Jijun
    Yao, Dezhong
    Luo, Cheng
    Smith, Robert C.
    Li, Chunbo
    BRAIN IMAGING AND BEHAVIOR, 2022, 16 (05) : 2061 - 2071