Longitudinal Evaluation of Optic Disc Measurement Variability With Optical Coherence Tomography and Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy

被引:19
|
作者
Lin, Dusheng [1 ,2 ]
Leung, Christopher Kai Shun [1 ]
Weinreb, Robert N. [3 ]
Cheung, Carol Yim Lui [1 ]
Li, Haitao [1 ]
Lam, Dennis Shun Chiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Coll Med, JSIEC, STU CUHK, Shantou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Hamilton Glaucoma Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
optic disc measurement variability; optical coherence tomography; confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy; rim area; NERVE-FIBER LAYER; NEURORETINAL RIM; NORMAL EYES; GLAUCOMA; AREA; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e318179f879
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate and compare the longitudinal variability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) optic disc measurements. Methods: A total of 25 normal and 50 glaucomatous eyes from 75 subjects were included in the analysis. The optic disc was measured by OCT and CSLO. Three separate measurements collected over an average period of 8.5 +/- 0.9 months were used to evaluate reproducibility. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between age, refraction, diagnosis (glaucoma or normal), visual field mean deviation, optic disc area, signal strength variance (OCT), optic disc area variance (OCT), image quality SD (CSLO), reference height variance (CSLO), and rim area variability. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient of optic disc measurements (except for optic disc area) ranged between 0.86 and 0.95 for OCT and between 0.89 and 0.96 for CSLO. The intraclass correlation coefficient for ran area measurement was significantly higher in CSLO (0.95) than that of Our (0.86, P < 0.001). After adjustment for other predictors, optic disc area variance and reference height variance were the most important factors responsible for rim area variability in OCT and CSLO, respectively. Conclusions: Although both OCT and OSLO have relatively low variability for optic disc measurements, CSLO demonstrates higher measurement reproducibility for rim area compared with OCT. Variations of disc area in OCT and reference height in CSLO constituted a significant proportion of the rim area variability during longitudinal assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the influence of tilt of optic disc on the measurement of optic disc variables obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
    Park, CY
    Kim, YT
    Kee, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2005, 14 (03) : 210 - 214
  • [2] Optic disc measurements in myopia with optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
    Leung, Christopher Kai-shun
    Cheng, Arthur Chak Kwan
    Chong, Kelvin Kam Lung
    Leung, King Sai
    Mohamed, Shaheeda
    Lau, Charles Sing Lok
    Cheung, Carol Yim Lui
    Chu, Geoffrey Chin-hung
    Lai, Ricky Yiu Kwong
    Pang, Calvin Chi Pui
    Lam, Dennis Shun Chiu
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2007, 48 (07) : 3178 - 3183
  • [3] Correlations Between Digital Planimetry and Optical Coherence Tomography, Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy in Assessment of Optic Disc Parameters
    Buteikiene, Dovile
    Paunksnis, Alvydas
    Barzdziukas, Valerijus
    Zaliuniene, Dalia
    Balciuniene, Iurate Vilma
    Jegelevicius, Darius
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2012, 48 (03): : 150 - 158
  • [4] Comparison of optic nerve head measurements obtained by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
    Schuman, JS
    Wollstein, G
    Farra, T
    Hertzmark, E
    Aydin, A
    Fujimoto, JG
    Paunescu, LA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 135 (04) : 504 - 512
  • [6] Assessment of the Optic Disc Morphology Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy
    Calvo, Pilar
    Ferreras, Antonio
    Abadia, Beatriz
    Ara, Mirian
    Figus, Michele
    Pablo, Luis E.
    Frezzotti, Paolo
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [7] Comparison of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and high-definition optical coherence tomography measurements of optic disc parameters
    Foo, Li-Lian
    Perera, Shamira A.
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    Allen, John C.
    Zheng, Yingfeng
    Loon, Seng-Chee
    Wong, Tien Y.
    Aung, Tin
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 96 (04) : 576 - 580
  • [8] Combined multiplanar optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy
    Podoleanu, AG
    Dobre, GM
    Cucu, RG
    Rosen, R
    Garcia, P
    Nieto, J
    Will, D
    Gentile, R
    Muldoon, T
    Walsh, J
    Yannuzzi, LA
    Fisher, Y
    Orlock, D
    Weitz, R
    Rogers, JA
    Dunne, S
    Boxer, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2004, 9 (01) : 86 - 93
  • [9] Comparison of optic nerve head measurement by optical coherence tomography and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope
    Kee, C
    Yong, PC
    Taek, KY
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U109 - U109
  • [10] COMPARISON OF A NOVEL CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY ALGORITHM WITH OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN MEASUREMENT OF MACULAR THICKNESS AND VOLUME
    Lee, Byung Ro
    Bartsch, Dirk-Uwe
    Kozak, Igor
    Cheng, Lingyun
    Freeman, William R.
    [J]. RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2009, 29 (09): : 1328 - 1334