A comparison of heuristic search algorithms for molecular docking

被引:92
|
作者
Westhead, DR [1 ]
Clark, DE [1 ]
Murray, CW [1 ]
机构
[1] PROTEUS MOL DESIGN LTD,MACCLESFIELD SK11 OJL,CHESHIRE,ENGLAND
关键词
ligand-protein docking; molecular recognition; evolutionary algorithms; simulated annealing; tabu search;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007934310264
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This paper describes the implementation and comparison of four heuristic search algorithms (genetic algorithm, evolutionary programming, simulated annealing and tabu search) and a random search procedure for flexible molecular docking. To our knowledge, this is the first application of the tabu search algorithm in this area. The algorithms are compared using a recently described fast molecular recognition potential function and a diverse set of five protein-ligand systems. Statistical analysis of the results indicates that overall the genetic algorithm performs best in terms of the median energy of the solutions located. However, tabu search shows a better performance in terms of locating solutions close to the crystallographic ligand conformation. These results suggest that a hybrid search algorithm may give superior results to any of the algorithms alone.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 228
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of heuristic search algorithms for molecular docking
    David R. Westhead
    David E. Clark
    Christopher W. Murray
    [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 1997, 11 : 209 - 228
  • [2] A comparison of three heuristic algorithms for molecular docking
    Hou, TJ
    Xu, XJ
    Chen, LR
    [J]. PEPTIDES: BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2000, : 65 - 68
  • [3] A Comparison of Three Heuristic Algorithms for Molecular Docking
    Ting Jun HOU
    Jun Mei WANG
    Xiao Jie XU(Department of Chemistry. Beida-Jiuyuan Molecular Design Laboratory. Peking University.Beijing 100871)
    [J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 1999, (07) : 615 - 618
  • [4] A comparison of three heuristic algorithms for molecular docking
    Hou, TJ
    Wang, JM
    Xu, XJ
    [J]. CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS, 1999, 10 (07) : 615 - 618
  • [5] A comparison of genetic/memetic algorithms and other heuristic search techniques
    Areibi, S
    Moussa, M
    Abdullah, H
    [J]. IC-AI'2001: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS I-III, 2001, : 660 - 666
  • [6] Comparison of three nature inspired molecular docking algorithms
    Cechova, Petra
    Kubala, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTATION, 2021, 17 (01) : 34 - 41
  • [7] A Comparison of Heuristic Search Algorithms for Predicting the Effort Component of Software Projects
    Uysal, Mitat
    [J]. 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR MODELLING CONTROL & AUTOMATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 92 - 97
  • [8] Comparison of Search Algorithms and Heuristic Methods in the Solution of Chess Endgame Problems
    Cesmeli, Melike Siseci
    Pence, Ihsan
    Cetisli, Bayram
    [J]. 2016 24TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATION APPLICATION CONFERENCE (SIU), 2016, : 1509 - 1512
  • [9] Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening
    Ewing, TJA
    Kuntz, ID
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 18 (09) : 1175 - 1189
  • [10] Molecular Docking Algorithms
    Dias, Raquel
    de Azevedo, Walter Filgueira, Jr.
    [J]. CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2008, 9 (12) : 1040 - 1047