Prospects for Peircean Epistemic Infinitism

被引:2
|
作者
Aikin, Scott F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1163/18758185-90000117
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Epistemic infinitism is the view that infinite series of inferential relations are productive of epistemic justification. Peirce is explicitly infinitist in his early work, namely his 1868 series of articles. Further, Peirce's semiotic categories of firsts, seconds, and thirds favors a mixed theory of justification. The conclusion is that Peirce was an infinitist, and particularly, what I will term an impure infinitist. However, the prospects for Peirce's infinitism depend entirely on the prospects for Peirce's early semantics, which are not good. Peirce himself revised the semantic theory later, and in so doing, it seems also his epistemic infinitism.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 87
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Trouble with Infinitism
    Andrew D. Cling
    Synthese, 2004, 138 : 101 - 123
  • [22] Infinitism regained
    Peijnenburg, Jeanne
    MIND, 2007, 116 (463) : 597 - 602
  • [23] Demystifying epistemic emotions: Evidences and prospects
    Shukla, Jaya
    Singh, Ram M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 434 - 435
  • [24] INFINITISM AND SCEPTICISM
    Oakley, Tim
    EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2019, 16 (01): : 108 - 118
  • [25] Infinitism and probabilistic justification
    Bewersdorf, Benjamin
    SYNTHESE, 2014, 191 (04) : 691 - 699
  • [26] The Problem with Impure Infinitism
    Inusah, Husein
    CROATIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 21 (62) : 339 - 351
  • [27] Propositional Justification and Infinitism
    Flores, Tito
    MANUSCRITO, 2017, 40 (04) : 141 - 158
  • [28] The trouble with infinitism
    Cling, AD
    SYNTHESE, 2004, 138 (01) : 101 - 123
  • [29] Modest infinitism
    Fantl, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2003, 33 (04) : 537 - 562
  • [30] Why not infinitism?
    Klein, PD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTIETH WORLD CONGRESS OF PHILOSOPHY, VOL 5: EPISTEMOLOGY, 2000, : 199 - 208