Canopy Gap Dynamics in a Second-Growth Appalachian Hardwood Forest in West Virginia

被引:8
|
作者
Himes, Jamie Marie [1 ]
Rentch, James S. [1 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Div Forestry & Nat Resources, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
Appalachian hardwoods; canopy gaps; disturbance; stand dynamics; succession; SOUTHERN APPALACHIANS; CUMBERLAND PLATEAU; OAK FORESTS; DISTURBANCE; STANDS; PATTERNS; REGENERATION; SUCCESSION; AGE; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.2179/13-006
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
We examined canopy gaps on the 3,100 ha West Virginia University Research Forest (WVURF), a 70-80 year-old, second-growth, Appalachian hardwood forest near Morgantown, West Virginia. The objectives of this study were: (a) to describe gap characteristics (size, age, fraction, regeneration and gap-makers) of the forest as a whole, and (b) to assess whether gap characteristics varied by slope position (cove, midslope, ridge), slope aspect (NE, NW, SE, SW), and forest type (cove hardwood, mesic oak, xeric oak). Sixty transects were established, with a total length of 22,043 m. Eighty canopy gaps were identified. Average gap size was 98.6 (+/- 134.17) m(2). Gap age ranged from 2-29 years old with a mean age of 16.4 (+/- 6.3) yrs. Overall, 2.7% of the forest was composed of gaps. There were no differences in gap size by aspect or slope position. Cove hardwoods had larger gap sizes than mesic and xeric oak forests. There were no differences in gap age based on slope position, aspect, or forest type. Gap fraction did not differ by slope position, but gap fraction was greatest on southeast slopes and in cove hardwoods. Because the WVURF is a young forest in the stem exclusion and early understory initiation stages of development, tree mortality is primarily driven by stand-level competition. Thus, gaps are smaller compared to old-growth forests in the region, where overstory mortality is largely density independent. Almost two-thirds of gap-makers were Quercus spp., while Quercus spp. and Prunus serotina were the most important regeneration within gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 184
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ECOLOGY OF VEGETATION OF A SECOND-GROWTH SEQUOIA FOREST
    BISWELL, HH
    BUCHANAN, H
    GIBBENS, RP
    ECOLOGY, 1966, 47 (04) : 630 - &
  • [22] LEAF LITTER REDISTRIBUTION IN A WEST-VIRGINIA HARDWOOD FOREST
    ORNDORFF, KA
    LANG, GE
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1981, 69 (01) : 225 - 235
  • [23] Gap characteristics of southeastern Ohio second-growth forests
    Hix, DM
    Helfrich, KK
    13TH CENTRAL HARDWOOD FOREST CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 234 : 247 - 253
  • [24] Spatial and temporal dynamics in canopy dominance of an old-growth central Appalachian forest
    McEwan, Ryan W.
    Muller, Robert N.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2006, 36 (06) : 1536 - 1550
  • [25] Effects of selective tree harvests on aboveground biomass and net primary productivity of a second-growth northern hardwood forest
    Dyer, Jacob H.
    Gower, Stith T.
    Forrester, Jodi A.
    Lorimer, Craig G.
    Mladenoff, David J.
    Burton, Julia I.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2010, 40 (12) : 2360 - 2369
  • [26] Genetic consequences of tropical second-growth forest regeneration
    Sezen, UU
    Chazdon, RL
    Holsinger, KE
    SCIENCE, 2005, 307 (5711) : 891 - 891
  • [27] A comparison of growth efficiency of plants on the east and west sides of a forest canopy gap
    Barden, LS
    BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB, 1996, 123 (03): : 240 - 242
  • [28] A Decade of Understory Community Dynamics and Stability in a Mature Second-growth Forest in Western Washington
    Rex, Ida
    Fischer, Dylan G.
    Bartlett, Ryan
    NORTHWEST SCIENCE, 2023, 96 (3-4) : 164 - 183
  • [29] Second-growth redwood forest responses to restoration treatments
    Soland, Kevin R.
    Kerhoulas, Lucy P.
    Kerhoulas, Nicholas J.
    Teraoka, J. R.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 496
  • [30] Spatial Dynamics of Canopy Trees in an Old Growth Eastern Hemlock Forest in the Central Appalachian Highlands
    Griscom, H. P.
    Griscom, B. G.
    Siderhurst, L.
    NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2014, 34 (01) : 99 - 104