Beta-blocker use and survival in patients with ventricular fibrillation or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia: The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial

被引:76
|
作者
Exner, DV
Reiffel, JA
Epstein, AE
Ledingham, R
Reiter, MJ
Yao, Q
Duff, HJ
Follmann, D
Schron, E
Greene, HL
Carlson, MD
Brodsky, MA
Akiyama, T
Baessler, C
Anderson, JL
机构
[1] NHLBI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00234-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents, alone or in combination with specific antiarrhythmic therapy, is associated with improved survival in persons with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT). BACKGROUND The ability of beta-blockers to alter the mortality of patients with VF or VT receiving contemporary medical management is not well defined. METHODS Survival of 1,016 randomized and 2,101 eligible, nonrandomized patients with VF or symptomatic VT followed in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial through December 31, 1996 was assessed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS The 817 (28%) patients discharged from hospital receiving beta-blockers had less ventricular dysfunction, fewer symptoms of heart failure and a different pattern of medication use compared with patients not receiving beta-blockers. Before adjustment for important prognostic variables, beta-blockade was not significantly associated with survival in randomized or in eligible, nonrandomized patients treated with specific antiarrhythmic therapy. After adjustment, beta-blockade remained unrelated to survival in randomized or in eligible, nonrandomized patients treated with amiodarone alone (n = 1142; adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.45; p = 0.85) or a defibrillator alone (n = 1347; adjusted RR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.40; p = 0.58). In contrast, beta-blockade was independently associated with improved survival in eligible, nonrandomized patients who were not treated with specific antiarrhythmic therapy (n = 412; adjusted RR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.88; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS Beta-blocker use was independently associated with improved survival in patients with VF or symptomatic VT who were not treated with specific antiarrhythmic therapy, but a protective effect was not prominent in patients already receiving amiodarone or a defibrillator. (C) 1999 by the American College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 333
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arrhythmia recurrence in patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation compared to ventricular tachycardia in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial
    Raitt, MH
    Klein, RC
    Greene, LH
    Wilkoff, BL
    Wyse, GD
    Beckman, KJ
    Martins, JB
    Kim, SG
    Epstein, AE
    Engelstein, ED
    Friedman, PI
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 494 - 494
  • [2] Comparison of arrhythmia recurrence in patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation versus ventricular tachycardia in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial
    Raitt, MH
    Klein, RC
    Wyse, DG
    Wilkoff, BL
    Beckman, K
    Epstein, AE
    Coromilas, J
    Friedman, PL
    Martins, J
    Ledingham, RB
    Greene, HL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (07): : 812 - 816
  • [3] Beta-blocker use and mortality in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) cohort.
    Exner, DV
    Epstein, AE
    Reiter, MJ
    Yao, Q
    Ledingham, R
    Reiffel, JA
    Brodsky, M
    Akiyama, T
    Schron, E
    Follmann, D
    Anderson, J
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 494 - 494
  • [4] Effect of antiarrhythmic therapy on survival in patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the antiarrhythmics vs implantable defibrillators (AVID)trial registry
    Beckman, KJ
    Klein, RC
    Page, RL
    Love, JC
    Follmann, D
    Moore, RT
    Kandrac, J
    Cannom, DS
    Duff, HJ
    Hallstrom, A
    CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (08) : 1868 - 1868
  • [5] Effect of surgical revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry
    Cook, JR
    Rizo-Patron, C
    Curtis, AB
    Gillis, AM
    Bigger, JT
    Kutalek, SP
    Coromilas, J
    Hofer, BI
    Powell, J
    Hallstrom, AP
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 143 (05) : 821 - 826
  • [6] Stable ventricular tachycardia may not be benign: Insights from the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) registry
    Renfroe, EG
    Raitt, MH
    McAnulty, J
    Epstein, AE
    Carlson, MD
    Powell, JL
    Hallstrom, A
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 494 - 494
  • [7] Stable ventricular tachycardia is not a benign rhythm - Insights from the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) registry
    Raitt, MH
    Renfroe, EG
    Epstein, AE
    McAnulty, JH
    Mounsey, P
    Steinberg, JS
    Lancaster, SE
    Jadonath, RL
    Hallstrom, AP
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 103 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [8] The results of the antiarrhythmic versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial can be applied to the general ventricular tachycardia ventricular fibrillation patient population
    Kim, SG
    Love, JC
    Rosenberg, Y
    Powell, J
    Brodsky, M
    Moore, R
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 358A - 358A
  • [9] Gender differences in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: Impact on treatment and survival in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial
    Engelstein, ED
    Friedman, PL
    Yao, Q
    Coromilas, J
    Beckman, KJ
    Buxton, AE
    Flynn, D
    Firth, B
    Delamagas, H
    Ledingham, R
    Schron, EB
    CIRCULATION, 1997, 96 (08) : 4036 - 4036
  • [10] Prognostic value of baseline electrophysiology studies in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia: The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial
    Brodsky, MA
    Mitchell, LB
    Halperin, BD
    Raitt, MH
    Hallstorm, AP
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (03) : 478 - 484