Diagnosis of prostate cancer: Repeated transrectal prostate biopsy or transurethral resection

被引:9
|
作者
Lin, Chih-Chieh [1 ]
Huang, William J. S. [1 ,3 ]
Wu, Li-Ju [2 ]
Change, Yen-Hwa [1 ,3 ]
Lin, Alex T. L. [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Kuang-Kuo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Nursing, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
biopsy; prostatic neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; transurethral resection of the prostate;
D O I
10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70147-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate is the major method by which prostate cancer is diagnosed. However, many patients might be overlooked with the initial biopsy. Not uncommonly, patients need repeated biopsies when they continue to exhibit suspicious clinical signs. This may cause psychological stress to both patients and doctors. The purpose of this study was to determine how many repeat transrectal biopsies are adequate for prostate cancer detection and when to switch to transurethral resection. Methods: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 2,996 patients who had undergone prostate biopsy. If the biopsy specimen was negative for malignancy, patients were given the choice of either being managed with observation or undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) if indicated. If there was a high suspicion of cancer, patients were advised to undergo additional biopsies. The primary endpoint of this study was a diagnosis of cancer. Results: The cancer detection rate was 22.9% (685 of 2,996 patients) in specimens taken during the first transrectal biopsy, 8.7% in those taken during the second biopsy (32 of 336 patients), and 6.1% in those taken during the third biopsy (6 of 98 patients). The cancer detection rate of TURP after 1 negative biopsy result was 9.3% (35 of 375 patients), and that after 2 negative biopsy results was 17.1% (6 of 35 patients). TURP-derived specimens that were pathologically diagnosed as malignant had lower Gleason grade on average, no matter how many repeat biopsies there were in patients whose previous transrectal biopsy specimens were negative for malignancy (p = 0.002 for 2 negative biopsy results and p = 0.007 for 3 negative biopsy results). Conclusion: The chance of detecting malignancy beyond a third transrectal biopsy procedure is low. TURP, therefore, might be an alternative procedure for obtaining tissue for pathologic diagnosis, especially in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen levels and comorbid illnesses such as obstructive symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 454
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between thulium laser resection of prostate and transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate or transurethral resection of prostate
    Hong DeCao
    Jia Wang
    Yu Huang
    Ren LiangLiu
    Hao JunLei
    Liang Gao
    Zhuang Tang
    Chun YingHu
    Xiang Li
    Hong JiuYuan
    Qiang Dong
    Qiang Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [32] Diagnostic Accuracy of Transperineal MRI Fusion Biopsy in Comparison to Transrectal Biopsy with Regard to Incidental Histopathological Findings in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja Christina
    Popeneciu, Ionel Valentin
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Teber, Dogu
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2017, 99 (02) : 162 - 167
  • [33] Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jianjian Xiang
    Huaqing Yan
    Jiangfeng Li
    Xiao Wang
    Hong Chen
    Xiangyi Zheng
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 17
  • [34] Nomogram to predict prostate cancer diagnosis on transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in a contemporary series
    DiBlasio, Christopher J.
    Maddox, Michael M.
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Malcolm, John B.
    Aleman, Michael A.
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    Patterson, Anthony L.
    Wake, Robert W.
    Kaftan, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 643 - 644
  • [35] Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiang, Jianjian
    Yan, Huaqing
    Li, Jiangfeng
    Wang, Xiao
    Chen, Hong
    Zheng, Xiangyi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [36] The impact of systematic prostate biopsy on prostate cancer incidence in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate
    Ornstein, DK
    Rao, GS
    Smith, DS
    Andriole, GL
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (03): : 880 - 883
  • [37] DIAGNOSIS OF CANDIDAL INFECTION OF THE PROSTATE BY TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND BIOPSY
    WILLIAMSON, MR
    SMITH, AY
    BLACK, WC
    ROSENBERG, RD
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1992, 20 (09) : 618 - 620
  • [38] Prostate cancer detection with 24-core transrectal biopsy of the prostate
    Mak, C. W. H.
    Cho, C. L.
    Chan, W. K. W.
    Chu, R. W. H.
    Law, I. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 108 - 108
  • [39] TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND AND PROSTATE-CANCER RISKS - THE TAILORED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    LITTRUP, PJ
    SPARSCHU, R
    CANCER, 1995, 75 (07) : 1805 - 1813
  • [40] Transurethral Resection of Prostate
    Agrawal, Madhu S.
    Mishra, Dilip K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 : S29 - S34