Sulphonylureas and risk of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:104
|
作者
Phung, O. J. [1 ,2 ]
Schwartzman, E. [1 ,2 ]
Allen, R. W. [1 ]
Engel, S. S. [3 ]
Rajpathak, S. N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Pharm, Pomona, CA 91766 USA
[2] Western Diabet Inst, Pomona, CA USA
[3] Merck & Co Inc, Whitehouse Stn, NJ USA
关键词
TYPE-2; DIABETES-MELLITUS; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; RETROSPECTIVE COHORT; ARTERY-DISEASE; METFORMIN; ROSIGLITAZONE; PIOGLITAZONE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/dme.12232
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimsSulphonylurea use has been linked with increased cardiovascular disease risk; however, previous studies have been inconsistent. Type2 diabetes independently increases risk for cardiovascular disease, so understanding the link between longer-term use of anti-diabetic medications and cardiovascular disease has important clinical implications. MethodsLiterature search in MEDLINE and CENTRAL was conducted throughout December 2011 for clinical and observational studies that reported the association between sulphonylurea and cardiovascular disease events. Ratios (relative risk, odds ratios or hazard ratios) adjusted for potential confounders (concomitant medications, baseline cardiovascular risk, diabetes severity) were pooled using a random-effects model to yield relative risks and associated 95% confidence intervals. ResultsThis meta-analysis included 33 studies (n=1,325,446 patients), followed for a range of 0.46-10.4years. In all studies, compared with other oral diabetes drugs, sulphonylurea use was associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular death (relative risk1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.34, n=27 comparisons) and composite cardiovascular event (including myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular-related hospitalization or cardiovascular death) (relative risk1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.16, n=43 comparisons). In studies comparing sulphonylurea vs. metformin, these relative risks were 1.26 (95% confidence interval 1.17-1.35, n=17 comparisons) and 1.18 (95%confidence interval 1.13-1.24, n=16 comparisons), respectively. ConclusionsResults suggest that sulphonylurea use may elevate the risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with diabetes. This meta-analysis expands the pool of studies evaluating cardiovascular mortality compared with prior observations while using adjusted estimates, and assessing an additional outcome of a composite cardiovascular event. This finding warrants consideration in clinical practice when other treatment options may be available.
引用
收藏
页码:1160 / 1171
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vasectomy and cardiovascular disease risk A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Zhen-Lang
    Xu, Jing-Li
    Lai, Ren-Kui
    Wang, Shu-Sheng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (34)
  • [2] Endometriosis and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Okoli, Unoma
    Charoenngam, Nipith
    Ponvilawan, Ben
    Jaroenlapnopparat, Aunchalee
    Mettler, Sofia
    Obiejesie, Onyenma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 32 (12) : 1328 - 1339
  • [3] Peanut and cardiovascular disease risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Azad, Banafsheh
    Daneshzad, Elnaz
    Azadbakht, Leila
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2020, 60 (07) : 1123 - 1140
  • [4] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Methotrexate Use and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
    Micha, Renata
    Imamura, Fumiaki
    von Ballmoos, Moritz Wyler
    Solomon, Daniel H.
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    Ridker, Paul M.
    Mozaffarian, Dariush
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 108 (09): : 1362 - 1370
  • [5] Sexual violence and cardiovascular disease risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jakubowski, Karen P.
    Murray, Vanessa
    Stokes, Natalie
    Thurston, Rebecca C.
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2021, 153 : 48 - 60
  • [6] α-Linolenic acid and risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pan, An
    Chen, Mu
    Chowdhury, Rajiv
    Wu, Jason H. Y.
    Sun, Qi
    Campos, Hannia
    Mozaffarian, Dariush
    Hu, Frank B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2012, 96 (06): : 1262 - 1273
  • [7] Sexual Violence and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jakubowski, Karen P.
    Murray, Vanessa
    Stokes, Natalie
    Thurston, Rebecca C.
    [J]. MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2021, 28 (12): : 1450 - 1450
  • [8] Bronchiectasis and cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barone, Ivan
    Gramegna, Andrea
    Colombo, Crizia
    Arcadu, Antonella
    Privitera, Emilia
    Alicandro, Gianfranco
    Amati, Francesco
    Vicenzi, Marco
    Aliberti, Stefano
    Blasi, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [9] Risk of incident cardiovascular disease in people with periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Larvin, Harriet
    Kang, Jing
    Aggarwal, Vishal R.
    Pavitt, Sue
    Wu, Jianhua
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 7 (01): : 109 - 122
  • [10] Gallstone Disease and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
    Fairfield, Cameron
    Wigmore, Stephen
    Harrison, Ewen
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 47 - 47