Ethical recommendations for a difficult decision-making in intensive care units due to the exceptional situation of crisis by the COVID-19 pandemia: A rapid review & consensus of experts

被引:58
|
作者
Rubio, O. [1 ]
Estella, A. [2 ]
Cabre, L. [3 ]
Saralegui-Reta, I [4 ]
Martin, M. C. [5 ]
Zapata, L. [6 ]
Esquerda, M. [7 ]
Ferrer, R. [8 ]
Castellanos, A. [9 ]
Trenado, J. [10 ]
Amblas, J. [11 ]
机构
[1] Xarxa Assistencial Univ Manresa, Althaia, Cuidados Intens, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Jerez, Cuidados Intens, Cadiz, Spain
[3] Com Bioet Cataluna, Cuidados Intens, Catalunya, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Araba, Cuidados Intens, Vitoria, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Torrejon, Serv Med Intens, Madrid, Spain
[6] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Cuidados Intens, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Inst Borja Bioet, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Hosp Univ Vall Hebron, Serv Med Intens, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Hosp Univ & Politecn La Fe, Area Med Crit, Valencia, Spain
[10] Hosp Univ Mutua Terrassa, Serv Med Intens, Barcelona, Spain
[11] Univ Vic UCC, Geriatria & Cuidados Paliat, Hosp Univ Santa Creu Vic, Cent Catalonia Chronic Res Grp C3RG, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Pandemic; Crisis care; ICU; Catastrophe; Ethics;
D O I
10.1016/j.medin.2020.04.006
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
In view of the exceptional public health situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, a consensus work has been promoted from the ethics group of the Spanish Society of Intensive, Critical Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), with the objective of finding some answers from ethics to the crossroads between the increase of people with intensive care needs and the effective availability of means. In a very short period, the medical practice framework has been changed to a 'catastrophe medicine' scenario, with the consequent change in the decision-making parameters. In this context, the allocation of resources or the prioritization of treatment become crucial elements, and it is important to have an ethical reference framework to be able to make the necessary clinical decisions. For this, a process of narrative review of the evidence has been carried out, followed by a unsystematic consensus of experts, which has resulted in both the publication of a position paper and recommendations from SEMICYUC itself, and the consensus between 18 scientific societies and 5 institutes/chairs of bioethics and palliative care of a framework document of reference for general ethical recommendations in this context of crisis. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 445
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] EVALUATION OF THE DOCUMENT: "GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO DIFFICULT ETHICAL DECISIONS AND THE ADEQUACY OF THE HEALTH CARE / ADMISSION IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN EXCEPTIONAL CRISIS SITUATIONS" BY THE REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL OF HEALTH CARE ETHICS. D. JUAN GOMEZ RUBI- (CAREA)
    Alarcon Sevilla, Veronica
    Allegue Gallego, Jose Manuel
    Andreu Martinez, Belen
    Donoso Paredes, Federico
    Fernandez Soria, Jose Maria
    Garcia Garcia, Teresa
    Jimenez Gonzalez, Joaquin
    Martinez Ros, Maria Teresa
    Pacheco Guevara, Rafael
    Miguel Pastor, Luis
    Salcedo Hernandez, Jose Ramon
    CUADERNOS DE BIOETICA, 2020, 31 (102): : 247 - 251
  • [22] Varying (preferred) levels of involvement in treatment decision-making in the intensive care unit before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study among relatives
    Renckens, Sophie C.
    Pasman, H. Roeline
    Jorna, Zina
    Klop, Hanna T.
    Perron, Chantal du
    van Zuylen, Lia
    Steegers, Monique A. H.
    ten Tusscher, Birkitt L.
    van Mol, Margo M. C.
    Vloet, Lilian C. M.
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [23] Varying (preferred) levels of involvement in treatment decision-making in the intensive care unit before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study among relatives
    Sophie C. Renckens
    H. Roeline Pasman
    Zina Jorna
    Hanna T. Klop
    Chantal du Perron
    Lia van Zuylen
    Monique A.H. Steegers
    Birkitt L. ten Tusscher
    Margo M.C. van Mol
    Lilian C.M. Vloet
    Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24
  • [24] Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
    Sarah E. Neil-Sztramko
    Emily Belita
    Robyn L. Traynor
    Emily Clark
    Leah Hagerman
    Maureen Dobbins
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [25] Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
    Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.
    Belita, Emily
    Traynor, Robyn L.
    Clark, Emily
    Hagerman, Leah
    Dobbins, Maureen
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [26] A bespoke rapid evidence review process engaging stakeholders for supporting evolving and time-sensitive policy and clinical decision-making: reflection and lessons learned from the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre 2021–2023
    Ruth Lewis
    Alison Cooper
    David Jarrom
    Mala Mann
    Rebecca-Jane Law
    Deborah Edwards
    Judith Carrier
    Hannah Shaw
    Tom Winfield
    Llinos Haf Spencer
    Jane Noyes
    Helen Morgan
    Jennifer Washington
    Elise Hasler
    Micaela Gal
    Elizabeth Doe
    Natalie Joseph-Williams
    Adrian Edwards
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 23 (1)