Limited value of multiparametric MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging in non-mass enhancing breast tumors

被引:10
|
作者
Marino, Maria Adele [1 ,2 ]
Avendano, Daly [1 ,3 ]
Sevilimedu, Varadan [4 ]
Thakur, Sunitha [1 ,5 ]
Martinez, Danny [1 ]
Lo Gullo, Roberto [1 ]
Horvat, Joao V. [1 ]
Helbich, Thomas H. [6 ]
Baltzer, Pascal A. T. [6 ]
Pinker, Katja [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Breast Imaging Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Univ Messina, Dept Biomed Sci & Morphol & Funct Imaging, Messina, Italy
[3] Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Tecnol Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
[6] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Biomed Imaging & Image guided Therapy, Div Mol & Struct Preclin Imaging, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; Breast neoplasms; Non-mass enhancement; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; AVERAGE RISK; CANCER; WOMEN; LESIONS; DWI; DIFFERENTIATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; MALIGNANCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110523
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic value of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) including dynamic contrast -enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in non-mass enhancing breast tumors.Method: Patients who underwent mpMRI, who were diagnosed with a suspicious non-mass enhancement (NME) on DCE-MRI (BI-RADS 4/5), and who subsequently underwent image-guided biopsy were retrospectively included. Two radiologists independently evaluated all NMEs, on both DCE-MR images and high -b-value DW images. Different mpMRI reading approaches were evaluated: 1) with a fixed apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) threshold (<1.3 malignant, >= 1.3 benign) based on the recommendation by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI); 2) with a fixed ADC threshold (<1.5 malignant, >= 1.5 benign) based on recently published trial data; 3) with an ADC threshold adapted to the assigned BI-RADS classification using a previously published reading method; and 4) with individually determined best thresholds for each reader. Results: : The final study sample consisted of 66 lesions in 66 patients. DCE-MRI alone had the highest sensitivity for breast cancer detection (94.8-100 %), outperforming all mpMRI reading approaches (R1 74.4-87.1 %, R2 71.7-94.8 %) and DWI alone (R1 74.4 %, R2 79.4 %). The adapted approach achieved the best specificity for both readers (85.1 %), resulting in the best diagnostic accuracy for R1 (86.5 %) but a moderate diagnostic accuracy for R2 (77.2 %). Conclusion: mpMRI has limited added diagnostic value to DCE-MRI in the assessment of NME.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiparametric MR Imaging with High-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Imaging at 7 T Improves the Assessment of Breast Tumors: A Feasibility Study
    Pinker, Katja
    Baltzer, Pascal
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Leithner, Doris
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    Zaric, Olgica
    Dubsky, Peter
    Bago-Horvath, Zsuzsanna
    Rudas, Margaretha
    Gruber, Stephan
    Weber, Michael
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 276 (02) : 360 - 370
  • [22] Parotid gland lesions: separate and combined diagnostic value of conventional MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Yuan, Ying
    Tang, Weiqing
    Tao, Xiaofeng
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1060):
  • [23] Role of combined clinical-radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting the malignancy of breast non-mass enhancements without an additional diffusion-weighted imaging sequence
    Li, Yan
    Yang, Zhenlu
    Lv, Wenzhi
    Qin, Yanjin
    Tang, Caili
    Yan, Xu
    Yin, Ting
    Ai, Tao
    Xia, Liming
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 13 (09) : 5974 - 5985
  • [24] Prostate cancer detection with MRI: is dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging necessary in addition to diffusion-weighted imaging?
    Iwazawa, Jin
    Mitani, Takashi
    Sassa, Seitaro
    Ohue, Shoichi
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (03) : 243 - 248
  • [25] Comment on the value of multiparametric MRI in breast non-mass lesions
    An, Yongyu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 163
  • [26] Effectivity of combined diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced MRI in malignant and benign breast lesions
    Yadav, Pratiksha
    Chauhan, Surbhi
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 83 : E82 - E93
  • [27] Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images
    Yabuuchi, Hidetake
    Matsuo, Yoshio
    Kamitani, Takeshi
    Setoguchi, Taro
    Okafuji, Takashi
    Soeda, Hiroyasu
    Sakai, Shuji
    Hatakenaka, Masamitsu
    Kubo, Makoto
    Tokunaga, Eriko
    Yamamoto, Hidetaka
    Honda, Hiroshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (01) : E126 - E132
  • [28] Lymphoma and Inflammation in the Orbit: Diagnostic Performance With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Sun, Bo
    Song, Liyuan
    Wang, Xinyan
    Li, Jing
    Xian, Junfang
    Wang, Feifei
    Tan, Pan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 45 (05) : 1438 - 1445
  • [29] Combined Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Diagnosing Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules
    Wu, F.
    Liu, J.
    Hu, C.
    Liu, J.
    Zhao, W.
    Wu, Y.
    Xu, Y.
    Hu, J.
    Xiao, L.
    Liu, X.
    Pan, Y.
    Zeng, Y.
    Shi, S.
    Peng, Y.
    Jiang, Y.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (09) : S195 - S196
  • [30] Perfusion Parameters in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Diffusion-weighted MRI: Association with Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer
    Lee, Hyun Sil
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Baek, Ji Eun
    Song, Byung Joo
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 446 - 456