Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache in the primary care setting: Pharmacological management for prevention of migraine

被引:52
|
作者
Rapoport, Alan
Mauskop, Alexander
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Schwalen, Susanne
Pfeil, Joop
机构
[1] New England Ctr Headache, Stamford, CT 06902 USA
[2] New York Headache Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Neurol, Essen, Germany
[4] Janssen Cilag EMEA, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Estimate Med Stat BV, Doesburg, Netherlands
来源
HEADACHE | 2006年 / 46卷 / 07期
关键词
topiramate; migraine prevention; headache;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00506.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-To demonstrate that topiramate is an effective and generally well-tolerated migraine preventive therapy when used for up to 14 months. Background.-Topiramate 100 and 200 mg/d significantly reduced mean monthly migraine frequency during 2 large, 26-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Only a small number of clinical trials have examined the long-term (>= 1 year) effectiveness and safety of migraine preventive therapies. Methods.-Five hundred sixty-seven patients with an established history of migraine with or without aura were enrolled in this 8-month, open-label extension of 2 large (49 US and 52 US and Canadian medical centers), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, 26-week trials of identical design. To be eligible for the open-label extension, patients were required to have either completed the double-blind phase of the 2 pivotal migraine prevention trials or withdrew after 4 weeks due to lack of efficacy. All eligible patients, regardless of type or dose of study medication (topiramate or placebo) received in the double-blind phase, were titrated to a clinically effective dose of open-label topiramate based on physician judgment of patient response. Efficacy of topiramate was measured as the change in mean monthly migraine frequency. Results.-The mean topiramate dose during the open-label extension phase was 124.7 mg/d and 150.3 mg/d for patients on placebo (n = 159) or topiramate (n = 408), respectively, during the double-blind phase (N = 567, 91% female, mean age 39.4 years). Patients on topiramate for up to 14 months had 2.2 +/- 2.4 (mean +/- SD) migraines per month after completion of the open-label extension phase (3.4 +/- 2.6 at double-blind endpoint). Patients on topiramate during the open-label extension phase only (placebo during the double-blind phase) had 3.0 +/- 2.9 migraines per month at open-label extension endpoint (4.9 +/- 3.0 migraines per month at double-blind endpoint). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events during the double-blind phase were 22.2% for patients on topiramate and 11.0% for patients on placebo. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events during the open-label extension phase were 8.6% for those patients who had already received topiramate during the double-blind phase and 20.9% for those patients who had previously received placebo. Conclusions.-Patients receiving topiramate experienced a sustained reduction in migraine frequency for up to 14 months. The effectiveness and safety of topiramate was consistent with that observed during 2 26-week pivotal trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1160
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Migraine headache, evidence-based guidelines, and the AAFP
    Wall, EM
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2002, 66 (11) : 2050 - 2050
  • [2] New guidelines for the management of migraine in primary care
    Dowson, AJ
    Lipscombe, S
    Sender, J
    Rees, T
    Watson, D
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2002, 18 (07) : 414 - 439
  • [3] Acute treatment and prevention of menstrually related migraine headache - Evidence-based review
    Pringsheim, Tamara
    Davenport, William Jeptha
    Dodick, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (17) : 1555 - 1563
  • [4] Migraine treatment and prevention guidelines created for primary care
    不详
    GERIATRICS, 2003, 58 (02) : 24 - 24
  • [5] Importance of Documentation in the Primary Care Setting for Migraine Prevention
    Buletko, Andrew
    Winslow, Jessica
    Stillman, Mark
    Bamford, Cynthia
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86
  • [6] Comparing colleges' of pharmacy didactic migraine education to the US headache consortium's evidence-based migraine treatment guidelines
    Wenzel, R. G.
    Padiyara, R. S.
    Schommer, J. C.
    CEPHALALGIA, 2009, 29 : 54 - 54
  • [7] Toward evidence-based management of migraine
    Matchar, DB
    McCrory, DC
    Gray, RN
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (20): : 2640 - 2641
  • [8] Pharmacologic management of acute attacks of migraine and prevention of migraine headache
    Snow, V
    Weiss, K
    Wall, EM
    Mottur-Pilson, C
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (10) : 840 - 849
  • [9] Considerations for management of migraine symptoms in the primary care setting
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2016, 128 (05) : 523 - 537
  • [10] Migraine: Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Management Update
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 33 (04) : 309 - 311