The neural bases of discourse semantic and pragmatic deficits in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

被引:11
|
作者
Luzzi, Simona [1 ]
Baldinelli, Sara [1 ]
Ranaldi, Valentina [1 ]
Fiori, Chiara [1 ]
Plutino, Andrea [1 ]
Fringuelli, Fabio M. [2 ]
Silvestrini, Mauro [1 ]
Giosue, Baggi [3 ]
Reverberi, Carlo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Marche, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Torrette Di Ancona, Italy
[2] Osped Riuniti Ancona, Dept Nucl Med, Ancona, Italy
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Language & Literature, Language Acquisit & Language Proc Lab, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[5] Milan Ctr Neurosci, NeuroMI, Milan, Italy
关键词
Neuropsychology; Alzheimer's disease; Behavioral variant frontotemporal; dementia; Language; Semantics; Discourse; Pragmatics; Idioms; Inference; Humor; PRIMARY PROGRESSIVE APHASIA; MINI-MENTAL-STATE; BEHAVIORAL-VARIANT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; QUANTITATIVE METAANALYSIS; METAPHOR COMPREHENSION; IDIOM COMPREHENSION; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; LOBAR DEGENERATION; SOCIAL COGNITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Neuropsychological research on language has largely focused on how the brain processes single words and sentences whose meaning does not depend on the context or on the intentions of the speaker. Fewer studies have investigated the neurobiological bases of discourse semantics and pragmatics in patients and healthy individuals. We studied discourse semantic and pragmatic skills in patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) in comparison to healthy controls. Our goal was to assess whether and how the two patient groups differ in their cognitive and behavioral profiles, and whether these differences may be traced back to disease -specific patterns of neuronal hypometabolism. We combined PET imaging with standard neuro- psychological assessment tools and a dedicated test battery designed to evaluate discourse semantics and pragmatics in patients with brain lesions or neurological disorders. We found that AD and bvFTD patients were both impaired compared to controls in discourse comprehension, but largely spared in single word comprehension. Importantly, we also found evidence for behavioral impairments specific to each disease, associated with different brain damage patterns. Compared to AD and controls, bvFTD patients had, behaviorally, more difficulty in evaluating whether certain inferences follow from discourse and in identifying humorous completions of stories; neurally, they had greater damage to medial and lateral regions of PFC. AD patients showed a different pattern of errors in a humor comprehension task than bvFTD patients and controls, and they showed greater posterior temporal and parietal cortical depletion. Both groups had comparable difficulties with understanding idioms and indirect requests. Finally, bvFTD-specific errors were correlated with the severity of hypometabolism in bvFTD. We discuss these results in light of previous research on the dementias as well as consequences for models of semantics and pragmatics in the brain. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 191
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Animal models of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia
    Jürgen Götz
    Lars M. Ittner
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2008, 9 : 532 - 544
  • [42] Amygdaloid atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease
    Boccardi, M
    Pennanen, C
    Laakso, MP
    Testa, C
    Geroldi, C
    Soininen, H
    Frisoni, GB
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2002, 335 (02) : 139 - 143
  • [43] The molecular basis of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia
    Kwok, JBJ
    Schofield, PR
    AGEING BRAIN: THE NEUROBIOLOGY AND NEUROPSYCHIATRY OF AGEING, 2003, : 173 - 185
  • [44] A comparison of unawareness in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease
    Salmon, E.
    Perani, D.
    Collette, F.
    Feyers, D.
    Kalbe, E.
    Holthoff, V.
    Sorbi, S.
    Herholz, K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 79 (02): : 176 - 179
  • [45] Recall and Recognition in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia
    Caruso, Giulia
    Perri, Roberta
    Fadda, Lucia
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Carlesimo, Giovanni Augusto
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2020, 77 (02) : 655 - 666
  • [46] Emotional recognition in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease
    Girolami, F.
    Benuzzi, F.
    Nichelli, P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 253 : 91 - 91
  • [47] Criminal behavior in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease
    Haussmann, R.
    Krug, C.
    Noppes, F.
    Brandt, M.
    Lange, J.
    Donix, M.
    NERVENARZT, 2022, 93 (01): : 59 - 67
  • [48] Deficient rule monitoring differentiates frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's and semantic dementia
    Carey, CL
    Racine, CA
    Woods, SP
    Seeley, W
    Johnson, JK
    Benavides, B
    Beckman, V
    Delis, DC
    Miller, BL
    Kramer, JH
    NEUROLOGY, 2006, 66 (05) : A55 - A55
  • [49] Working memory in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia
    Stopford, C. L.
    Thompson, J. C.
    Richardson, A. M. T.
    Neary, D.
    Snowden, J. S.
    BEHAVIOURAL NEUROLOGY, 2010, 23 (04) : 177 - 179
  • [50] Animal models of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia
    Gotz, Jurgen
    Ittner, Lars M.
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 9 (07) : 532 - 544