Moderators of the benefits of psychoeducational interventions for men with prostate cancer

被引:65
|
作者
Helgeson, Vicki S. [1 ]
Lepore, Stephen. J.
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Hlth & Behav Studies, Teachers Coll, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Evanston NW Healthcare, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
prostate cancer; psychoeducational intervention; quality of life; self-esteem; self-efficacy;
D O I
10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.348
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The authors examined whether 3 individual difference variables-self-esteem, self-efficacy, and depressive symptoms-interacted with psychoeducational group interventions' for men with prostate. cancer (n = 250) to predict general and prostate-specific quality of life. Men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were randomly assigned to an education intervention, an education plus group discussion intervention, or usual care and followed for 12 months. Eight groups of 10 to 12 men were convened in each condition. Men who began the study with lower self-esteem, lower prostate-specific self-efficacy, and higher depressive symptoms benefited,the most from the interventions. Of these 3 moderator variables, the most consistent results emerged for self-esteem. That is, the benefits of the intervention were strongest for men with low self-esteem.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 354
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROSTATE CANCER The benefits of multidisciplinary prostate cancer care
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2012, 9 (07) : 360 - 362
  • [42] PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF ARTHRITIS
    HAWLEY, DJ
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1995, 9 (04): : 803 - 823
  • [43] Insight and psychoeducational interventions in schizophrenia
    Billiet, C.
    Antoine, P.
    Lesage, R.
    Sangare, M. -L.
    ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2009, 167 (10): : 745 - 752
  • [44] Screening Men at Increased Risk for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Model Estimates of Benefits and Harms
    Gulati, Roman
    Cheng, Heather H.
    Lange, Paul H.
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Etzioni, Ruth
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2017, 26 (02) : 222 - 227
  • [45] Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature
    A. C. Wootten
    J. M. Abbott
    A. Farrell
    D. W. Austin
    B. Klein
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2014, 8 : 472 - 484
  • [46] New Rates of Interventions to Manage Complications of Modern Prostate Cancer Treatment in Older Men
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Mahar, Alyson
    Cheung, Patrick
    Herschorn, Sender
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Al-Matar, Ashraf
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Lee, Yuna
    Kodama, Ronald T.
    Narod, Steven A.
    Nam, Robert K.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (05) : 933 - 941
  • [47] Behaviour change techniques in physical activity interventions for men with prostate cancer: A systematic review
    Hallward, Laura
    Patel, Nisha
    Duncan, Lindsay R.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 25 (01) : 105 - 122
  • [48] Are we ready for the new wave of focal therapy interventions for men with early prostate cancer?
    Emberton, Mark
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (04) : 423 - 424
  • [49] Evidence-based Prostate Cancer Screening Interventions for Black Men: A Systematic Review
    Lopez, Abigail
    Bailey, Jared T.
    Galloway, Dorothy
    Woods-Burnham, Leanne
    Montgomery, Susanne B.
    Kittles, Rick
    Teteh-Brooks, Dede K.
    JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2024,
  • [50] What are the effects of multimodal prehabilitation interventions in men affected by prostate cancer? A systematic review
    Paterson, Catherine
    Roberts, Cara
    Kozlovskaia, Maria
    Nahon, Irmina
    Schubach, Kath
    Sara, Sally
    Lourenco, Richard De Abreu
    Turner, Murray
    Chan, Raymond J.
    Lam, Thomas
    Woo, Henry
    Toohey, Kellie
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 : 221 - 221