Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery

被引:26
|
作者
Fernandes, E. [1 ]
Giulianotti, P. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Div Gen Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Pancreatic surgery; Robotic surgery; Whipple's procedure; Distal pancreatectomy; LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY; AUTOLOGOUS ISLET TRANSPLANTATION; SINGLE INSTITUTION; OPEN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; LATERAL PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; MIDDLE PANCREATECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; PYLORUS;
D O I
10.1007/s00534-013-0615-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Pancreatic surgery is a challenging application of minimally invasive surgery. Due to the complexity of the surgical technique, requiring dissection along major abdominal vessels as well as delicate reconstruction involving biliary, pancreatic and enteric anastomoses, reports on laparoscopic pancreatic surgery have been scanty. With the advent of robotic-assisted surgery, however, the increased dexterity granted by endo-wristed instruments, the improved three-dimensional vision and the computer filtration of the surgeon's movements have brought minimally invasive pancreatic surgery into a new era. As the surgical group which has performed the highest number of robotic-assisted pancreatic procedures worldwide, we review the state of the art of minimally invasive robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery. Clinical results from all major robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery series are considered. Preliminary reports from the published major pancreatic surgery series show encouraging results, with morbidity and mortality comparable to open surgery. Preliminary data on cancer survival rates also appear to be similar to open series. Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery is safe and feasible for all pancreatic diseases. The complexity of pancreatic procedures warrant them to be carried out in specialised centres, where short- and long-term outcomes seem to be similar to the ones achieved in open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 589
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the Kinematics of Robotic-assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    From, Pal Johan
    MODELING IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL, 2013, 34 (02) : 69 - 82
  • [42] Robotic-assisted surgery in children: Advantages and limitations
    Al-Bassam A.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 4 (1) : 19 - 22
  • [43] Technological Advances in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
    Tan, Gerald Y.
    Goel, Raj K.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 36 (02) : 237 - +
  • [44] Learning Experiences in Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
    Nezhat, Ceana
    Lakhi, Nisha
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 35 : 20 - 29
  • [45] Robotic-assisted surgery and the evolution of the radical prostatectomy
    Anderson, K. M.
    Ruckle, H. C.
    Baldwin, D. D.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2012, 64 (02) : 97 - 122
  • [46] Our anesthesia experiences at robotic-assisted and robotic cardiac surgery
    Kocyigit, Muharrem
    Akpek, Elif A.
    Tetik, Ozlem
    Senay, Sahin
    Alhan, Cem
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 21 (04): : 972 - 977
  • [47] Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery pneumonectomy
    Motas, Natalia
    Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego
    Bosinceanu, Mugurel Liviu
    Gallego-Poveda, Javier
    Garcia-Perez, Alejandro
    Manolache, Veronica
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 12 (01) : 67 - 69
  • [48] Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Ayav, A
    Bresler, L
    Hubert, J
    Brunaud, L
    Boissel, P
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (09): : 1200 - 1203
  • [49] Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology—status quo
    Alkatout I.
    Maass N.
    Egberts J.-H.
    Jünemann K.-P.
    Ackermann J.
    Kimmig R.
    Der Gynäkologe, 2016, 49 (6): : 470 - 476
  • [50] Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer
    Holloway, Robert W.
    Ahmad, Sarfraz
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 38 (01) : 1 - 8