Fellowship Match Outcomes in the US From 2010 to 2017: Analysis of San Francisco Match

被引:15
|
作者
Zafar, Sidra [1 ]
Bressler, Neil M. [1 ]
Golnik, Karl C. [2 ]
Srikumaran, Divya [1 ]
Ghous, Zara [1 ]
Ip, Samantha [1 ]
Chen, Xinyi [1 ]
Woreta, Fasika A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Wilmer Eye Inst, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Ophthalmol, Cincinnati Eye Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
SELECTION CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To describe applicant characteristics and outcomes associated with the ophthalmology fellowship match. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. METHODS: This study took place in San Francisco and matched data for ophthalmology fellowship applicants in the USA. The study population was registrants for the 2010-2017 ophthalmology fellowship match cycles. The match rate took place during the 8-year study period. Applicant characteristics were stratified by match status and factors associated with matching to ophthalmology fellowship positions. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, most applicants (2,558/3,471; 73.7%) were matched into ophthalmology fellowship programs. No difference over time in the proportion of applicants that matched for fellowship was identified (P [ .41). On average, ophthalmology residents who were matched into fellowships had higher step 1 (difference: 9; 99% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-10.9; P < .001), step 2 (difference: 9.5; 99% CI: 7-12; P < .001), and step 3 (difference: 7.4; 99% CI: 5-9.7; P <.001) scores than those who did not match. Applicants who matched also had a greater number of application distributions (difference: 9.6; 99% CI: 7.911.2; P < .001), and ranked programs on the match list (difference: 6.2; 99% CI: 5.8-6.7; P < .001). Among applicants who matched, 15% matched at the same institute, 29% matched in the same state, and 45% matched in the same region. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increased likelihood of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship program included graduates from the US versus graduates from non-US residency programs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.09; 99% CI: 1.27-3.44; P <.001), increasing percentage of applications ranked (number of ranked programs and/ or number of applications distributed) (OR: 1.02; 99% CI: 1.02-1.03; P < .001) as well as having ranked more programs (OR: 1.24; 99% CI: 1.17-1.31; P <.001). Medical graduate status outside of the US (OR: 0.58; 99% CI: 0.36-0.93; P < .001) was associated with decreased odds of matching for fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2017, approximately three-quarters of residents applying for an ophthalmology fellowship position matched. Factors associated with increased likelihood of matching included the applicant's graduating from a U.S. residency, graduating from a U.S. medical school, ranking more programs, and having a higher percentage of applications ranked (number of programs ranked by applicant and/or number of applications distributed). The information gained from this study may help applicants as they consider applying to fellowship programs. ((C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 267
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analysis of the microsurgery fellowship match: 2019-2022 update
    McGraw, J. Reed
    Sulkar, Reena S.
    Amro, Chris
    Gala, Zachary
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Wong, Alex K.
    Kovach, Stephen J.
    Matros, Evan
    Azoury, Said C.
    MICROSURGERY, 2024, 44 (06)
  • [22] The State of the Headache Fellowship Application Process and Attitudes towards the Match: Interview of US Headache Fellowship Program Directors
    Zhang, Niushen
    Armand, Cynthia
    Berk, Thomas
    Friedman, Deborah
    NEUROLOGY, 2020, 94 (15)
  • [23] Navigating the Orthopaedic Trauma Fellowship Match from a Candidate's Perspective
    Griffin, Sean M.
    Stoneback, Jason W.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2011, 25 : S101 - S103
  • [24] Analysis of the Microsurgery Match from 2014 to 2018 Reveals Increased Competition for Microsurgery Fellowship Positions
    Cooper, Michael N.
    Daneshgaran, Giulia
    Yu, Roy
    Chang, Jeff
    Vartanian, Emma
    Shamsunder, Meghana
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Matros, Evan M.
    Wong, Alex K.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2019, 35 (09) : 662 - 668
  • [25] Recent trends in match process outcomes for US senior medical students
    Andriole, DA
    Whelan, AJ
    Schechtman, KB
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (10) : S6 - S9
  • [26] Match Analysis of Elite Ice Sledge Hockey in Paralympics 2010
    Hayrinen, Mikko
    Juntunen, Jouni
    Blomqvist, Minna
    Overmark, Sami
    Molik, Bartosz
    Kosmol, Andrzej
    Morgulec-Adamowicz, Natalia
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN SPORTS, 2011, 7 (03)
  • [27] Has the Attractiveness of a Career in Rheumatology Changed for the Better? Comparison of Trends in the Rheumatology Fellowship Match from 2014 to 2017 with 2008 to 2013
    Tran, Huynh
    Panush, Richard
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 69
  • [28] Trends in Cardiology Specialty Applicants and Match Rates: A Comparative Analysis From 2017 to 2021
    Obeidat, Omar
    Abughazaleh, Saeed
    Tarawneh, Mohammad
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [29] 10 Year Analysis of Pediatric Surgery Fellowship Match and Operative Experience Concerning Trends?
    Farooqui, Zishaan
    Cortez, Alexander R.
    Potts, John R., III
    Tiao, Gregory M.
    von Allmen, Daniel
    Quillin III, Ralph C.
    Bondoc, Alexander J.
    Garrison, Aaron P.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (02) : E475 - E482
  • [30] Impact of Virtual Interviews on Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship Match An Analysis of National Data
    Alzghoul, Hamza
    Alsakarneh, Saqr
    Abughazaleh, Saeed
    Zeineddine, Lauran
    De Villa, Ariel Ruiz
    Reddy, Raju
    Faruqi, Ibrahim
    Alzghoul, Bashar
    ATS SCHOLAR, 2024, 5 (01): : 122 - 132