Fellowship Match Outcomes in the US From 2010 to 2017: Analysis of San Francisco Match

被引:15
|
作者
Zafar, Sidra [1 ]
Bressler, Neil M. [1 ]
Golnik, Karl C. [2 ]
Srikumaran, Divya [1 ]
Ghous, Zara [1 ]
Ip, Samantha [1 ]
Chen, Xinyi [1 ]
Woreta, Fasika A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Wilmer Eye Inst, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Ophthalmol, Cincinnati Eye Inst, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
SELECTION CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.008
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To describe applicant characteristics and outcomes associated with the ophthalmology fellowship match. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. METHODS: This study took place in San Francisco and matched data for ophthalmology fellowship applicants in the USA. The study population was registrants for the 2010-2017 ophthalmology fellowship match cycles. The match rate took place during the 8-year study period. Applicant characteristics were stratified by match status and factors associated with matching to ophthalmology fellowship positions. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2017, most applicants (2,558/3,471; 73.7%) were matched into ophthalmology fellowship programs. No difference over time in the proportion of applicants that matched for fellowship was identified (P [ .41). On average, ophthalmology residents who were matched into fellowships had higher step 1 (difference: 9; 99% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-10.9; P < .001), step 2 (difference: 9.5; 99% CI: 7-12; P < .001), and step 3 (difference: 7.4; 99% CI: 5-9.7; P <.001) scores than those who did not match. Applicants who matched also had a greater number of application distributions (difference: 9.6; 99% CI: 7.911.2; P < .001), and ranked programs on the match list (difference: 6.2; 99% CI: 5.8-6.7; P < .001). Among applicants who matched, 15% matched at the same institute, 29% matched in the same state, and 45% matched in the same region. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with an increased likelihood of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship program included graduates from the US versus graduates from non-US residency programs (odds ratio [OR]: 2.09; 99% CI: 1.27-3.44; P <.001), increasing percentage of applications ranked (number of ranked programs and/ or number of applications distributed) (OR: 1.02; 99% CI: 1.02-1.03; P < .001) as well as having ranked more programs (OR: 1.24; 99% CI: 1.17-1.31; P <.001). Medical graduate status outside of the US (OR: 0.58; 99% CI: 0.36-0.93; P < .001) was associated with decreased odds of matching for fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2017, approximately three-quarters of residents applying for an ophthalmology fellowship position matched. Factors associated with increased likelihood of matching included the applicant's graduating from a U.S. residency, graduating from a U.S. medical school, ranking more programs, and having a higher percentage of applications ranked (number of programs ranked by applicant and/or number of applications distributed). The information gained from this study may help applicants as they consider applying to fellowship programs. ((C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 267
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Insights into the MSDO Fellowship Match: an analysis of 2020-2022 San Francisco Match Data
    Olsen, Eric C.
    Kamath, Preetha
    Bergman, Daniel
    Huang, Conway
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (06)
  • [2] Outcomes in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Match, 2010-2017
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    Hayes, Meghan K.
    Smith, Christopher M.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    Trojan, Jeffrey D.
    McCarty, Eric C.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (05):
  • [3] Predictors of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship for international medical graduates: a San Francisco match analysis
    Muhammad Ali
    Safa Saeed
    Sidra Zafar
    Karl C. Golnik
    Fasika Woreta
    International Ophthalmology, 2023, 43 : 2029 - 2035
  • [4] Predictors of matching into an ophthalmology fellowship for international medical graduates: a San Francisco match analysis
    Ali, Muhammad
    Saeed, Safa
    Zafar, Sidra
    Golnik, Karl C. C.
    Woreta, Fasika
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 43 (06) : 2029 - 2035
  • [5] Applicant Characteristics Associated with Glaucoma Fellowship Match from 2010 to 2017
    Burton, Eleanor
    Arsiwala, Lubaina T.
    Johnson, Thomas, V
    Srikumaran, Divya
    Zafar, Sidra
    Woreta, Fasika A.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (02): : 233 - 240
  • [6] Match Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Training: 2010 to 2021
    Silvestre, Jason
    Brgdar, Ahmed
    DeLisser, Horace M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (24):
  • [7] Effect of Virtual Interviews on PCCM Fellowship Match Outcomes: Analysis of NRMP Data From 2017-2021
    Strumpf, Z. B.
    Miller, C.
    Abbas, K.
    Bensken, W. P.
    Matta, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [8] Insights From the San Francisco Match Rank List Data How Many Interviews Does It Take to Match?
    Malafa, Menyoli Michael
    Nagarkar, Purushottam A.
    Janis, Jeffrey E.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 72 (05) : 584 - 588
  • [9] Mohs Micrographic Surgery Application Characteristics and Trends: An Evaluation of San Francisco Match Data From 2017 to 2019
    Lim, Jordan
    Butt, Melissa
    Cartee, Todd
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2021, 47 (09) : 1272 - 1273
  • [10] Trends in the Orthopaedic Surgery Fellowship Match 2013 to 2017
    Wera, Glenn D.
    Eisinger, Sarah
    Oreluk, Hazel
    Cannada, Lisa K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2018, 2 (12):