How do interplanetary shock impact angles control the size of the geoeffective magnetosphere?

被引:18
|
作者
Rudd, J. T. [1 ]
Oliveira, D. M. [2 ,3 ]
Bhaskar, A. [3 ,4 ]
Halford, A. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] US Naval Acad, Dept Phys, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Goddard Planetary Heliophys Inst, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[4] Univ Corp Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO USA
[5] Aerosp Corp, Chantilly, VA USA
关键词
Interplanetary shocks; Shock impact angle; Geomagnetic activity; Geoeffective magnetospheric distance; RISE-TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2018.09.013
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate temporal and spatial magnetosphere response to the impact of interplanetary (IP) shocks with different inclinations and speeds on the Earth's magnetosphere. A data set with more than 500 IP shocks is used to identify positive sudden impulse (SI+) events as expressed by the SuperMAG partial ring current index. The SI+ rise time (RT), defined as the time interval between compression onset and maximum SI+ signature, is obtained for each event. We use RT and a model suggested by Takeuchi et al. (2002) to calculate the geoeffective magnetospheric distance (GMD) in the shock propagation direction as a function of shock impact angle and speed for each event. GMD is a generalization of the geoeffective magnetosphere length (GML) suggested by Takeuchi et al. (2002), defined from the subsolar point along the X line toward the tail. We estimate statistical GMD and GML values which are then reported for the first time. We also show that, similarly to well-known results for RT, the highest correlation coefficient for the GMD and impact angle is found for shocks with high speeds and small impact angles, and the faster and more frontal the shock, the smaller the GMD. This result indicates that the magnetospheric response depends heavily on shock impact angle. With these results, we argue that the prediction and forecasting of space weather events, such as those caused by coronal mass ejections, will not be accurately accomplished if the disturbances' angles of impact are not considered as an important parameter within model and observation scheme capabilities. (C) 2018 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 326
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Re: Zekey et al.: Evaluation of the Impact of Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Kidneys Using a New Marker: How Do Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lypocalin Values Changes After Shock Wave Lithotripsy? (Urology 2012;80:267-272) Reply
    Hasan, Soydan
    Ferhat, Ates
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (04) : 955 - 955
  • [22] HOW DO GLUCOCORTICOIDS, BIOLOGIC DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTI-RHEUMATIC DRUGS AND DISEASE ACTIVITY IMPACT THE RISK OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS BACTEREMIA IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS? A NATIONWIDE NESTED CASE CONTROL STUDY IN THE DANISH DANBIO COHORT
    Dieperink, S.
    Glintborg, B.
    Mehnert, F.
    Norgaard, M.
    Benfield, T.
    Torp-Pedersen, C.
    Oestergaard, L. B.
    Petersen, A.
    Hetland, M. L.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 571 - 571