How do interplanetary shock impact angles control the size of the geoeffective magnetosphere?

被引:18
|
作者
Rudd, J. T. [1 ]
Oliveira, D. M. [2 ,3 ]
Bhaskar, A. [3 ,4 ]
Halford, A. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] US Naval Acad, Dept Phys, Annapolis, MD 21402 USA
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Goddard Planetary Heliophys Inst, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[4] Univ Corp Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO USA
[5] Aerosp Corp, Chantilly, VA USA
关键词
Interplanetary shocks; Shock impact angle; Geomagnetic activity; Geoeffective magnetospheric distance; RISE-TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2018.09.013
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate temporal and spatial magnetosphere response to the impact of interplanetary (IP) shocks with different inclinations and speeds on the Earth's magnetosphere. A data set with more than 500 IP shocks is used to identify positive sudden impulse (SI+) events as expressed by the SuperMAG partial ring current index. The SI+ rise time (RT), defined as the time interval between compression onset and maximum SI+ signature, is obtained for each event. We use RT and a model suggested by Takeuchi et al. (2002) to calculate the geoeffective magnetospheric distance (GMD) in the shock propagation direction as a function of shock impact angle and speed for each event. GMD is a generalization of the geoeffective magnetosphere length (GML) suggested by Takeuchi et al. (2002), defined from the subsolar point along the X line toward the tail. We estimate statistical GMD and GML values which are then reported for the first time. We also show that, similarly to well-known results for RT, the highest correlation coefficient for the GMD and impact angle is found for shocks with high speeds and small impact angles, and the faster and more frontal the shock, the smaller the GMD. This result indicates that the magnetospheric response depends heavily on shock impact angle. With these results, we argue that the prediction and forecasting of space weather events, such as those caused by coronal mass ejections, will not be accurately accomplished if the disturbances' angles of impact are not considered as an important parameter within model and observation scheme capabilities. (C) 2018 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 326
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Impact angle control of interplanetary shock geoeffectiveness
    Oliveira, D. M.
    Raeder, J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2014, 119 (10) : 8188 - 8201
  • [2] Interplanetary Shock Impact Angles Control Magnetospheric ULF Wave Activity: Wave Amplitude, Frequency, and Power Spectra
    Oliveira, Denny M.
    Hartinger, Michael D.
    Xu, Zhonghua
    Zesta, Eftyhia
    Pilipenko, Vyacheslav A.
    Giles, Barbara L.
    Silveira, Marcos V. D.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (24)
  • [3] Impact angle control of interplanetary shock geoeffectiveness: A statistical study
    Oliveira, Denny M.
    Raeder, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2015, 120 (06) : 4313 - 4323
  • [4] Substorm-Time Ground dB/dt Variations Controlled by Interplanetary Shock Impact Angles: A Statistical Study
    Oliveira, Denny M.
    Weygand, James M.
    Coxon, John C.
    Zesta, Eftyhia
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 22 (03):
  • [5] How do interactions control droplet size during nanoprecipitation?
    Botet, Robert
    Roger, Kevin
    CURRENT OPINION IN COLLOID & INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2016, 22 : 108 - 112
  • [6] How Do Centralized and Distributed Version Control Systems Impact Software Changes?
    Brindescu, Caius
    Codoban, Mihai
    Shmarkatiuk, Sergii
    Dig, Danny
    36TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2014), 2014, : 322 - 333
  • [7] How do operators monitor a complex, dynamic work domain? The impact of control room technology
    Vicente, KJ
    Roth, EM
    Mumaw, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2001, 54 (06) : 831 - 856
  • [8] How do pressure impact attention control in precision sports: attentional engagement or attentional disengagement?
    Ai, Lixin
    Zhang, Liwei
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (30) : 25080 - 25095
  • [9] How Do Central Control Mechanisms Impact Local Water Governance in China? The Case of Yunnan Province
    Habich-Sobiegalla, Sabrina
    CHINA QUARTERLY, 2018, 234 : 444 - 462
  • [10] Do depicted suggestions of portion size on-pack impact how much (un)healthy food children consume
    Aerts, Goele
    Smits, Tim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2019, 43 (03) : 237 - 244