Twin studies of pain

被引:93
|
作者
Nielsen, C. S. [1 ]
Knudsen, G. P. [1 ]
Steingrimsdottir, O. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Mental Hlth, N-0403 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, N-0403 Oslo, Norway
关键词
genetics; heritability; pain; twin study; LOW-BACK-PAIN; GENETIC INFLUENCES; NECK PAIN; ENVIRONMENTAL-INFLUENCES; ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS; RISK-FACTORS; HERITABILITY; MIGRAINE; DANISH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01938.x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Twin studies provide a method for estimating the heritability of phenotypes and for examining genetic and environmental relationships between phenotypes. We conducted a systematic review of twin studies of pain, including both clinical and experimental pain phenotypes. Fifty-six papers were included, whereof 52 addressed clinical phenotypes. Of the most comprehensively studied phenotypes, available data indicates heritability around 50% for migraine, tension-type headache and chronic widespread pain, around 35% for back and neck pain, and around 25% for irritable bowel syndrome. However, differences in phenotype definitions make these results somewhat uncertain. All clinical studies relied on dichotomous outcomes and none used pain intensity as continuous phenotype. This is a major weakness of the reviewed studies and gives reason to question their validity with respect to pain mechanisms. Experimental pain studies indicate large differences in heritability across pain modalities. Whereas there is evidence for substantial common genetic risk across many clinical pain conditions, different experimental pain phenotypes appear to be associated with different genetic factors. Recommendations for future research include inclusion of pain intensity scaling and number of pain sites in phenotyping. Furthermore, studies examining the genetic relationships between pain phenotypes, in particular between clinical and experimental phenotypes, should be prioritized.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 340
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Classical twin studies and beyond
    Boomsma, D
    Busjahn, A
    Peltonen, L
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (11) : 872 - 882
  • [42] Mars: Twin studies on Mars
    Catling, DC
    [J]. NATURE, 2005, 436 (7047) : 42 - 43
  • [43] Twin studies and estimates of heritability
    Loos, RJF
    Beunen, G
    Fagard, R
    Derom, C
    Vlietinck, R
    Phillips, DIW
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9266): : 1445 - 1445
  • [44] TWIN STUDIES OF HUMAN OBESITY
    PRICE, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1991, 49 (04) : 81 - 81
  • [45] TWIN STUDIES ON AGING AND LONGEVITY
    KALLMANN, FJ
    SANDER, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1948, 39 (12) : 349 - 356
  • [46] Refractive errors in twin studies
    Dirani, Mohamed
    Chamberlain, Matthew
    Garoufalis, Pam
    Chen, Christine
    Guymer, Robyn H.
    Baird, Paul N.
    [J]. TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2006, 9 (04) : 566 - 572
  • [47] Twin studies, heritability, and intelligence
    Falek, A
    Jarvik, LF
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1997, 278 (5342) : 1385 - 1386
  • [48] TWIN STUDIES ON THE PSYCHOPATHOLOGY OF SUICIDE
    KALLMANN, FJ
    ANASTASIO, MM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1946, 37 (06) : 171 - 180
  • [49] TWIN STUDIES ON FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY
    KLISSOURAS, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 1976, 3 (01) : 79 - 80
  • [50] Twin studies: Modern tendencies
    Egorova, MS
    [J]. VOPROSY PSIKHOLOGII, 2004, (06) : 128 - 129