3.0 T multiparametric prostate MRI using pelvic phased-array coil: Utility for tumor detection prior to biopsy

被引:13
|
作者
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [1 ]
Mussi, Thais C. [1 ]
Borofsky, Michael S. [2 ]
Scionti, Stephen S. [2 ]
Grasso, Michael [3 ]
Taneja, Samir S. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Div Urol Oncol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10075 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biopsy; MRI; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; CANCER DETECTION; COMBINATION; SEXTANT; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.02.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed in men without a biopsy-proven diagnosis of prostate cancer using follow-up biopsy as the reference standard. Materials and methods: Forty-two patients without biopsy-proven cancer and who underwent MRI were included. In all patients, MRI was performed at 3T using a pelvic phased-array coil and included T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Thirteen had undergone no previous biopsy, and 29 had undergone at least 1 previous negative biopsy. All patients underwent prostate biopsy following MRI. Two fellowship-trained radiologists in consensus reviewed all cases and categorized each lobe as positive or negative for tumor. These interpretations were correlated with findings on post-MRI biopsy. Results: Follow-up biopsy was positive in 23 lobes in 15 patients (36% of study cohort). On a per-patient basis, MRI had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 74%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 68%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. On a per-lobe basis, MRI had a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 84%, PPV of 60%, and NPV of 86%. There was a nearly significant association between Gleason score and tumor detection on MRI (P = 0.072). Conclusions: In our sample, MRI had 100% sensitivity in predicting the presence of tumor on subsequent biopsy on a per-patient basis, suggesting a possible role for MRI in selecting patients with an elevated prostatic specific antigen (PSA) to undergo prostate biopsy. However, MRI had weaker specificity for prediction of a subsequent positive biopsy, as well as weaker sensitivity for tumor on a per-lobe basis, indicating that in patients with a positive MRI result, tissue sampling remains necessary for confirmation of the diagnosis as well as for treatment planning. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1435
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: Comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Vargas, H. Alberto
    Nyman, Gregory
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Akin, Oguz
    Hricak, Hedvig
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (10) : E515 - E520
  • [12] Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI
    Tatli, S
    Mortele, KJ
    Breen, EL
    Bleday, R
    Silverman, SG
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (04) : 534 - 540
  • [13] Rectal Cancer: Local Staging Using Combined Pelvic Phased-Array and Endorectal Coil MRI
    Radwan, S. M.
    Salem, H.
    Ziada, S.
    Rizk, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [14] 3T Multiparametric MRI (3T mMRI) With a Phased-Array Torso Coil in Staging of Prostate Cancer Patients (PCP) Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Results
    Counago, F.
    Recio, M.
    Del Cerro, E.
    Diaz, A. A.
    Marcos, F. J.
    Murillo, R.
    Rodriguez, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S409 - S410
  • [15] In vivo MRI using liquid nitrogen cooled phased array coil at 3.0 T
    Kwok, Wingchi E.
    You, Zhigang
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 24 (06) : 819 - 823
  • [16] Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal–pelvic phased-array coilsLocal staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging
    Jurgen J. Fütterer
    Marc R. Engelbrecht
    Gerrit J. Jager
    Robert P. Hartman
    Bernard F. King
    Christina A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa
    J. Alfred Witjes
    Jelle O. Barentsz
    European Radiology, 2007, 17 : 1055 - 1065
  • [17] FAST SE MR IMAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER WITH A PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COIL
    KIER, R
    MCCARTHY, S
    MCCAULEY, TR
    SMITH, RC
    SCHIFF, S
    LYTTON, B
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 275 - 275
  • [18] Can 3-Tesla Pelvic Phased-Array Multiparametric MRI Avoid Unnecessary Repeat Prostate Biopsy in Patients With PSA < 10 ng/mL?
    Pepe, Pietro
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Giandomenico
    Pennisi, Michele
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2015, 13 (01) : E27 - E30
  • [19] Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils - Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Engelbrecht, Marc R.
    Jager, Gerrit J.
    Hartman, Robert P.
    King, Bernard F.
    Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) : 1055 - 1065
  • [20] Comparison between endorectal coil and pelvic phased-array coil magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anorectal tumor
    Matsuoka, H
    Nakamura, A
    Masaki, T
    Sugiyama, M
    Takahara, T
    Hachiya, J
    Atomi, Y
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 185 (04): : 328 - 332