3.0 T multiparametric prostate MRI using pelvic phased-array coil: Utility for tumor detection prior to biopsy

被引:13
|
作者
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [1 ]
Mussi, Thais C. [1 ]
Borofsky, Michael S. [2 ]
Scionti, Stephen S. [2 ]
Grasso, Michael [3 ]
Taneja, Samir S. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU Langone Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Div Urol Oncol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Lenox Hill Hosp, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10075 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biopsy; MRI; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; CANCER DETECTION; COMBINATION; SEXTANT; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.02.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed in men without a biopsy-proven diagnosis of prostate cancer using follow-up biopsy as the reference standard. Materials and methods: Forty-two patients without biopsy-proven cancer and who underwent MRI were included. In all patients, MRI was performed at 3T using a pelvic phased-array coil and included T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Thirteen had undergone no previous biopsy, and 29 had undergone at least 1 previous negative biopsy. All patients underwent prostate biopsy following MRI. Two fellowship-trained radiologists in consensus reviewed all cases and categorized each lobe as positive or negative for tumor. These interpretations were correlated with findings on post-MRI biopsy. Results: Follow-up biopsy was positive in 23 lobes in 15 patients (36% of study cohort). On a per-patient basis, MRI had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 74%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 68%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. On a per-lobe basis, MRI had a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 84%, PPV of 60%, and NPV of 86%. There was a nearly significant association between Gleason score and tumor detection on MRI (P = 0.072). Conclusions: In our sample, MRI had 100% sensitivity in predicting the presence of tumor on subsequent biopsy on a per-patient basis, suggesting a possible role for MRI in selecting patients with an elevated prostatic specific antigen (PSA) to undergo prostate biopsy. However, MRI had weaker specificity for prediction of a subsequent positive biopsy, as well as weaker sensitivity for tumor on a per-lobe basis, indicating that in patients with a positive MRI result, tissue sampling remains necessary for confirmation of the diagnosis as well as for treatment planning. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1435
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ROLE OF 3.0 T MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI (MP-MRI) BY PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COIL: A RATIONALE APPROACH FOR PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT
    Rosi, Giovanni
    Nuti, Alessandro
    Piscioli, Irene
    Gravante, Sabrina
    Rondoni, Valeria
    Palumbo, Barbara
    Rebonato, Alberto
    Scialpi, Michele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (10) : 6140 - 6141
  • [2] Prostate Cancer Detection at Repeat Biopsy: Can Pelvic Phased-array Multiparametric MRI Replace Saturation Biopsy?
    Pepe, Pietro
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Giandomenico
    Candiano, Giuseppe
    Pietropaolo, Francesco
    Pennisi, Michele
    Fraggetta, Filippo
    Aragona, Francesco
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (03) : 1195 - 1199
  • [3] Accuracy of 3 Tesla pelvic phased-array multiparametric MRI in diagnosing prostate cancer at repeat biopsy
    Pepe, Pietro
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Giandomenico
    Dibenedetto, Giuseppe
    Salemi, Michele
    Pennisi, Michele
    Fraggetta, Filippo
    Aragona, Francesco
    Barbera, Michele
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2014, 86 (04) : 336 - 339
  • [4] PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION WITH MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 32-CHANNEL "PHASED-ARRAY" AND THE "DUAL-COIL" MRI?
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Fiori, Cristian
    Bollito, Enrico
    De Pascale, Agostino
    Gned, Dario
    Dervishi, Najada
    Cirillo, Stefano
    Petracchini, Massimo
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Amparore, Daniele
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Garrou, Diletta
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Veltri, Andrea
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (05) : 2582 - 2582
  • [5] Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T
    Lewis, Sara
    Ganti, Aasrith
    Argiriadi, Pamela
    Rosen, Ally
    Hectors, Stefanie
    Semaan, Sahar
    Song, Christopher
    Peti, Steve
    Segall, Maxwell
    George, Kezia
    Jaikaran, Vaneela
    Villa, Sebastian
    Kestenbaum, David
    Voutsinas, Nicholas
    Doucette, John
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Taouli, Bachir
    CANCER IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T
    Sara Lewis
    Aasrith Ganti
    Pamela Argiriadi
    Ally Rosen
    Stefanie Hectors
    Sahar Semaan
    Christopher Song
    Steve Peti
    Maxwell Segall
    Kezia George
    Vaneela Jaikaran
    Sebastian Villa
    David Kestenbaum
    Nicholas Voutsinas
    John Doucette
    Ashutosh Tewari
    Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
    Bachir Taouli
    Cancer Imaging, 22
  • [7] Routine pelvic MRI using phased-array coil for detection of extraprostatic tumour extension: accuracy and clinical significance
    Hole, Knut Hakon
    Axcrona, Karol
    Lie, Agnes Kathrine
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Geier, Oliver Marcel
    Brennhovd, Bjorn
    Knutstad, Kjetil
    Olsen, Dag Rune
    Seierstad, Therese
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (04) : 1158 - 1166
  • [8] Routine pelvic MRI using phased-array coil for detection of extraprostatic tumour extension: accuracy and clinical significance
    Knut Håkon Hole
    Karol Axcrona
    Agnes Kathrine Lie
    Ljiljana Vlatkovic
    Oliver Marcel Geier
    Bjørn Brennhovd
    Kjetil Knutstad
    Dag Rune Olsen
    Therese Seierstad
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 1158 - 1166
  • [9] Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil
    Rory L. O’Donohoe
    Ruth M. Dunne
    Vera Kimbrell
    Clare M. Tempany
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 1062 - 1069
  • [10] Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil
    O'Donohoe, Rory L.
    Dunne, Ruth M.
    Kimbrell, Vera
    Tempany, Clare M.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (03) : 1062 - 1069