Survey of Motivations, Benefits, and Implementation Challenges of Last Planner System Users

被引:56
|
作者
Fernandez-Solis, Jose L. [1 ]
Porwal, Vishal [1 ]
Lavy, Sarel [1 ]
Shafaat, Ali [2 ]
Rybkowski, Zofia K. [1 ]
Son, Kiyoung [3 ]
Lagoo, Nishi [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, Coll Architecture, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Coll Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Architecture, Coll Architecture, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Percent plan complete (PPC); Last planner system; Five whys; Daily huddle meetings; Six sigma; Reasons charting and constraint analysis; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000606
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The number of construction project managers initializing the use of the Last Planner System of Production Control (LPS), an operating system for project management designed to optimize work flow and promote rapid learning, is rapidly increasing, motivated by industry trends and testimonials of its perceived benefits. This study, limited to the building sector, is a systematic literature and testimonial search of the perceived motivations and benefits or challenges for choosing LPS. It substantiates the claims of those perceptions through a structured survey of senior and mid-level managers. Quantitative statistical tools infer that practitioners who use LPS experience more reliable planning, better supply chain integration, and less work flow time. However, managers who directly implement LPS are faced with external resistance from clients and subcontractors, and feel that their organization does not offer the necessary incentives for adopting LPS, indicating a possible clash of paradigms. The case studies and testimonials were available in the literature referenced in the paper, but the survey and the method for analysis are new and have not been published elsewhere, either wholly or in part. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000606. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 360
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lean Construction in the UAE: Implementation of Last Planner System®
    Warid, Osama
    Hamani, Karima
    Lean Construction Journal, 2023, 2023 : 01 - 20
  • [2] Forecasting the Performance of Last Planner System Implementation Using System Dynamics
    Osman, Hesham
    Hatem, Abi
    Bakry, Mohamed
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2020: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROLS, MATERIALS, AND CONTRACTS, 2020, : 85 - 94
  • [4] Experiences from the implementation of last planner system® in construction project
    Venkatesh, Prasad Kudrekodlu
    Venkatesan, Vasugi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (02) : 125 - 141
  • [5] Framework for Managing Integration Challenges of Last Planner System in IMPs
    El-Sabek, Luai M.
    McCabe, Brenda Y.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 144 (05)
  • [6] Development of Approach to Support Construction Stakeholders in Implementation of the Last Planner System
    Daniel, Emmanuel Itodo
    Pasquire, Christine
    Dickens, Graham
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 35 (05)
  • [7] A survey on production planning system in construction projects based on Last Planner System
    Ha Duy Khanh
    Kim, Soo Yong
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 20 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [8] A survey on production planning system in construction projects based on Last Planner System
    Ha Duy Khanh
    Soo Yong Kim
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 20 : 1 - 11
  • [9] Effective Implementation of Last Planner System in Construction Projects: A Case Study
    Gjerde, M. R. D.
    Ratnayake, R. M. C.
    Samarakoon, S. M. S. M. K.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2019, : 1139 - 1144
  • [10] Techniques and benefits of implementing the last planner system in the Gaza Strip construction industry
    Tayeh, Bassam A.
    Al Hallaq, Khalid
    Zahoor, Hafiz
    Al Faqawi, Abdulla H.
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (07) : 1424 - 1436