Effects of perioperative briefing and debriefing on patient safety: a prospective intervention study

被引:31
|
作者
Leong, Katharina Brigitte Margarethe Siew Lan [1 ]
Hanskamp-Sebregts, Mirelle [2 ]
van der Wal, Raymond A. [1 ]
Wolff, Andre P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol Pain & Palliat Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Inst Qual Assurance & Patient Safety, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Pain Ctr, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 12期
关键词
TEAM CLIMATE INVENTORY; OPERATING-ROOM; CHECKLIST; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018367
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study was carried out to improve patient safety in the operating theatre by the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, which focused on an optimal collaboration between surgical team members. Design A prospective intervention study with one pretest and two post-test measurements: 1 month before and 4 months and 2.5 years after the implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing, respectively. Setting Operating theatres of a tertiary care hospital with 875 beds in the Netherlands. Participants All members of five surgical teams participated in the perioperative briefing and debriefing. Intervention The implementation of perioperative briefing and debriefing from July 2012 to January 2014. Primary and secondary outcomes The primary outcome was changes in the team climate, measured by the Team Climate Inventory. Secondary outcomes were the experiences of surgical teams with perioperative briefing and debriefing, measured with a structured questionnaire, and the duration of the briefings, measured by an independent observer. Results Two and a half years after the introduction of perioperative briefing and debriefing, the team climate increased statistically significant (p=0.05). Members of the five surgical teams strongly agreed with the positive influence of perioperative briefing and debriefing on clear agreements and reminding one another of the agreements of the day. They perceived a higher efficiency of the surgical programme with more operations starting on time and less unexpectedly long operation time. The perioperative briefing took less than 4 min to conduct. Conclusions Perioperative briefing and debriefing improved the team climate of surgical teams and the efficiency of their work within the operating theatre with acceptable duration per briefing. Surgical teams with alternating team compositions have the most benefit of briefing and debriefing.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Briefing Regarding In Situ Simulation: An Emerging Educational Safety Tool for Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
    Kosik, Edward
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2015, 53 (04) : 98 - 114
  • [22] Innovations in Perioperative Quality and Patient Safety
    Donald R. Miller
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2013, 60 : 201 - 205
  • [23] The effects of improving hospital physicians working conditions on patient care: a prospective, controlled intervention study
    Weigl, Matthias
    Hornung, Severin
    Angerer, Peter
    Siegrist, Johannes
    Glaser, Juergen
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
  • [24] The effects of improving hospital physicians working conditions on patient care: a prospective, controlled intervention study
    Matthias Weigl
    Severin Hornung
    Peter Angerer
    Johannes Siegrist
    Jürgen Glaser
    BMC Health Services Research, 13
  • [25] Perioperative nurses' experiences in relation to surgical patient safety: A qualitative study
    Penataro-Pintado, Ester
    Rodriguez, Encarna
    Castillo, Jordi
    Martin-Ferreres, Maria Luisa
    De Juan, Maria Angeles
    Diaz Agea, Jose Luis
    NURSING INQUIRY, 2021, 28 (02)
  • [26] Critical Incident Stress Debriefing After Adverse Patient Safety Events
    Harrison, Reema
    Wu, Albert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2017, 23 (05): : 310 - 312
  • [27] Communication and patient safety in gynecology and obstetrics - study protocol of an intervention study
    Lippke, Sonia
    Wienert, Julian
    Keller, Franziska Maria
    Derksen, Christina
    Welp, Annalena
    Koetting, Lukas
    Hofreuter-Gaetgens, Kerstin
    Mueller, Hardy
    Louwen, Frank
    Weigand, Marcel
    Ernst, Kristina
    Kraft, Katrina
    Reister, Frank
    Polasik, Arkadius
    Seemann, Beate Huener Nee
    Jennewein, Lukas
    Scholz, Christoph
    Hannawa, Annegret
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [28] Communication and patient safety in gynecology and obstetrics - study protocol of an intervention study
    Sonia Lippke
    Julian Wienert
    Franziska Maria Keller
    Christina Derksen
    Annalena Welp
    Lukas Kötting
    Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens
    Hardy Müller
    Frank Louwen
    Marcel Weigand
    Kristina Ernst
    Katrina Kraft
    Frank Reister
    Arkadius Polasik
    Beate Huener nee Seemann
    Lukas Jennewein
    Christoph Scholz
    Annegret Hannawa
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [29] Daily briefing promotes hospital-wide transparency and patient safety
    Hatva, E. (ehatva@aami.org), 1600, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 1110 North Glebe Road, Suite 220, Arlington, VA 22201-4795, United States (47):
  • [30] Preoperative Briefing in the Operating Room Shared Cognition, Teamwork, and Patient Safety
    Einav, Yael
    Gopher, Daniel
    Kara, Itzik
    Ben-Yosef, Orna
    Lawn, Margaret
    Laufer, Neri
    Liebergall, Meir
    Donchin, Yoel
    CHEST, 2010, 137 (02) : 443 - 449