7 Police Use of Less Lethal Force: Does Administrative Policy Matter?

被引:67
|
作者
Terrill, William [1 ]
Paoline, Eugene A., III [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Criminol & Criminal Justice, 411 N Cent Ave,Suite 600, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Criminal Justice, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
police; use of force; policy; discretion; continuum; ENERGY DEVICE USE; DEADLY FORCE; BEHAVIOR; CEDS;
D O I
10.1080/07418825.2016.1147593
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Scholars have long theorized that constraining police officer discretion via organizational policy improves decision-making. Empirically, prior research shows that more restrictive lethal force policies result in a reduction in the number of police shootings and in racial disparity. Yet, researchers have never examined the impact of less lethal force policies in relation to the full spectrum of less lethal force tactics. In addressing this research void, we examine 3,340 use of force incidents from three US agencies, each varying in terms of policy direction and restrictiveness. The results consistently show that officers working within the most restrictive policy framework used force less readily than officers who operated within more permissive policy environments. Hence, police administrators wishing to reduce coercion should consider the potential effect that a more restrictive policy may have on such behavior.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:193 / 216
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条