False-negative tests in breast cancer management

被引:0
|
作者
Coolen, A. [1 ]
Leunen, K. [1 ]
Menten, J. [2 ]
van Steenbergen, W. [3 ]
Neven, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, MBC, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Radiotherapy Oncol, MBC, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Internal Med Hepatol, MBC, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
来源
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2011年 / 69卷 / 7-8期
关键词
Breast cancer; investigations; metastases; sensitivity; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SERUM TUMOR-MARKERS; LYMPH-NODE STATUS; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; YOUNG-WOMEN; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; METASTASES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We review the sensitivity of different diagnostic tests for breast cancer management based on recent experience in a 34-year-old patient. False-negative tests at diagnosis of early disease and of relapse resulted in diagnostic and therapeutic delays. Initial mammography and breast ultrasonography were falsely negative despite a palpable breast lump. Clinical examination and axillary ultrasound missed macroscopically involved lymph nodes. At relapse, metastatic lesions were missed despite symptoms, three years after primary treatment. CA 15-3 was normal; bone and liver metastases were missed by standard and more advanced imaging techniques including liver ultrasonography, nuclear bone scan and PET-CT scan. Worsening of clinical symptoms, lab results and abnormal tissue biopsies finally led to the diagnosis of extensive metastatic disease. Genetic screening showed an abnormality within the BRCA-1 region of unknown clinical importance. This review highlights 1) that diagnostic tests managing symptomatic breast cancer patients may have a low sensitivity, 2) the importance of clinical findings and other markers for disease, such as lactate dehydrogenase and 3) the need for diagnostic biopsies for clinically suspect symptoms despite normal imaging and biochemistry.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 329
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] FALSE-NEGATIVE CPKS
    NIERENBERG, DW
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1977, 297 (16): : 894 - 894
  • [42] False-negative fluorescent treponemal tests and confirmation of syphilis infection
    Sordillo, EM
    Hoehl, B
    Belch, J
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 178 (01): : 294 - 295
  • [43] Frozen Sections in Gastric Cancer How Negative Is the False-Negative?
    Sachs, Teviah E.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (02) : 132 - 133
  • [44] The False-negative Phenotype
    Lantos, John D.
    PEDIATRICS, 2019, 143 : S33 - S36
  • [45] FALSE-NEGATIVE MARGINS
    HIRSCH, P
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 15 (04): : 452 - 453
  • [46] The false-negative mammogram
    Huynh, PT
    Jarolimek, AM
    Daye, S
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (05) : 1137 - 1154
  • [47] FALSE-NEGATIVE MARGINS
    ZIMMERMAN, MC
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1989, 15 (10): : 1124 - 1125
  • [48] Follow-up of cases with false-negative pathologic sentinel nodes in breast cancer
    Nagashima T.
    Yagata H.
    Nikaido T.
    Horiuchi F.
    Koda K.
    Miyazaki M.
    Breast Cancer, 2004, 11 (2) : 175 - 179
  • [49] Comparison between positive and false-negative sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients
    Abe, Eriko
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Onoda, Toshinao
    Yang, Yang
    Uno, Mieko
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Ohde, Sachiko
    Suzuki, Koyu
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [50] Multicentre study of detection and false-negative rates in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer
    Bergkvist, L
    Frisell, J
    Liljegren, G
    Celebioglu, F
    Damm, S
    Thörn, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (12) : 1644 - 1648