Agricultural policy and productivity: evidence from Brazilian censuses

被引:14
|
作者
Rada, Nicholas E. [1 ]
Buccola, Steven T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Econ Res Serv, USDA, Washington, DC 20024 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
O2; O3; Brazilian agriculture; Embrapa; Input distance function; Stochastic frontier; Total factor productivity; Technical change; Efficiency; NORTHEAST BRAZIL; CHINESE AGRICULTURE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00588.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Brazil's economic strategy has shifted hesitatingly during the last several decades from one of producer protection to trade competitiveness. Exploiting the variations these shifts have afforded, we use a sequence of decennial agricultural censuses to examine Brazilian policy implications for agricultural competitiveness and efficiency. Total factor productivity is decomposed into best-technology and efficiency elements, each subject to policy influence. We find technology growth, at 4.5% per annum, to have been extraordinarily high, particularly in the south. But because productivity among average producers has fallen rapidly behind that on the technical frontier, total productivity growth has been a much more modest 2.6% per year. Public agricultural research programs most benefit the country's technological leaders, widening the gap between frontier and average producer. Credit, education, and road construction policies instead narrow that gap. Credit and road programs especially enhance efficiency in the south, where efficiency losses have been greatest.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 367
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Moderating Effects of Support Policy on Agricultural Productivity
    Ismail, Siti Fatimah
    Sabri, Nur Ain Ayunni
    Zain, Eni Noreni Mohamad
    Mohamad, Mohd Rosli
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP VISION 2020: INNOVATION, DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY, AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2013, : 1175 - 1184
  • [32] Machinery structure, machinery subsidies, and agricultural productivity: Evidence from China
    Meng, Meng
    Yu, Leng
    Yu, Xiaohua
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 55 (02) : 223 - 246
  • [33] Can Credit Program Improve Agricultural Productivity? Evidence from Indonesia
    Wirakusuma, Gilang
    Irham, Irham
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRIBUSINESS AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (ICONARD 2020), 2021, 232
  • [34] The Agricultural Wage Gap: Evidence from Brazilian Micro-data
    Alvarez, Jorge A.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2020, 12 (01) : 153 - 173
  • [35] Land market distortions and aggregate agricultural productivity: Evidence from Guatemala
    Britos, Braulio
    Hernandez, Manuel A.
    Robles, Miguel
    Trupkin, Danilo R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 155
  • [36] Exploring the gender gap in agricultural productivity: Evidence from Sri Lanka
    Fukase, Emiko
    Kim, Yeon Soo
    Chiarella, Cristina
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2024,
  • [37] Gender and agricultural Productivity: Econometric evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda
    Julien, Jacques C.
    Bravo-Ureta, Boris E.
    Rada, Nicholas E.
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 171
  • [38] Adoption mode of agricultural machinery and food productivity: evidence from China
    Wei, Suhao
    Lu, Yangxiao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 7
  • [39] ICT and agricultural productivity: evidence from cross-country data
    Lio, MC
    Liu, MC
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (03) : 221 - 228
  • [40] Agricultural Productivity, Hired Labor, Wages, and Poverty: Evidence from Bangladesh
    Emran, Shahe
    Shilpi, Forhad
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 109 : 470 - 482