Agricultural policy and productivity: evidence from Brazilian censuses

被引:14
|
作者
Rada, Nicholas E. [1 ]
Buccola, Steven T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Econ Res Serv, USDA, Washington, DC 20024 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
O2; O3; Brazilian agriculture; Embrapa; Input distance function; Stochastic frontier; Total factor productivity; Technical change; Efficiency; NORTHEAST BRAZIL; CHINESE AGRICULTURE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00588.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Brazil's economic strategy has shifted hesitatingly during the last several decades from one of producer protection to trade competitiveness. Exploiting the variations these shifts have afforded, we use a sequence of decennial agricultural censuses to examine Brazilian policy implications for agricultural competitiveness and efficiency. Total factor productivity is decomposed into best-technology and efficiency elements, each subject to policy influence. We find technology growth, at 4.5% per annum, to have been extraordinarily high, particularly in the south. But because productivity among average producers has fallen rapidly behind that on the technical frontier, total productivity growth has been a much more modest 2.6% per year. Public agricultural research programs most benefit the country's technological leaders, widening the gap between frontier and average producer. Credit, education, and road construction policies instead narrow that gap. Credit and road programs especially enhance efficiency in the south, where efficiency losses have been greatest.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 367
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Agricultural Productivity and Forest Conservation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon
    Koch, Nicolas
    zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K. H. J.
    Wehkamp, Johanna
    Oliveira Filho, Francisco J. B.
    Schwerhoff, Gregor
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 (03) : 919 - 940
  • [2] The effects of agricultural policy on supply and productivity: Evidence from differential changes in distortions
    Hendricks, Nathan P.
    Smith, Aaron
    Villoria, Nelson B.
    Stigler, Matthieu
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 54 (01) : 44 - 61
  • [3] The impact of agricultural policy distortions on the productivity gap: Evidence from rice production
    Rakotoarisoa, Manitra A.
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2011, 36 (02) : 147 - 157
  • [4] Progress in the Brazilian cattle industry: an analysis of the Agricultural Censuses database
    Meyer, P. M.
    Rodrigues, P. H. M.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2014, 54 (09) : 1338 - 1344
  • [5] Health and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Zambia
    Fink, Guenther
    Masiye, Felix
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 42 : 151 - 164
  • [6] Wheat productivity in the Cape Colony in 1825: evidence from newly transcribed tax censuses
    Fourie, Johan
    Greyling, Jan
    [J]. AGREKON, 2023, 62 (01) : 98 - 115
  • [7] Agricultural land marketization and productivity: evidence from China
    Yao, Wanjun
    Wang, Chunan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 22 - 36
  • [8] Agricultural Productivity and Structural Transformation: Evidence from Brazil
    Bustos, Paula
    Caprettini, Bruno
    Ponticelli, Jacopo
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (06): : 1320 - 1365
  • [9] Forest change and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Indonesia
    Yamamoto, Yuki
    Shigetomi, Yosuke
    Ishimura, Yuichi
    Hattori, Mitsuru
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 114 : 196 - 207
  • [10] Agricultural Productivity and Land Inequality: Evidence from the Philippines
    Bequet, Ludovic
    [J]. WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2024, 38 (02): : 229 - 250