Life-cycle cost based design of bridge lead-rubber isolators in seismic regions

被引:14
|
作者
Asadi, Payam [1 ]
Nikfar, Davood [2 ]
Hajirasouliha, Iman [3 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Technol, Pardis Coll, Civil Engn Grp, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Life-cycle cost analysis; Bridge damage indices; Damage costs; Lead-rubber bearing isolators; Economic design of bridges; Seismic design;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.056
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
While rubber isolators are widely used for the seismic protection of bridges, their influence on the total life-cycle costs (TLCC) is generally neglected. This study aims to provide a framework to obtain the most cost-effective design solutions of Lead-Rubber Bearing (LRB) isolators for minimum objective functions based on the life-cycle cost of bridges. Also, a comprehensive analytical study is conducted to assess the effects of LRB characteristics on the total life-cycle costs (TLCC) consisting of the initial costs of LRB isolators and structural elements, traffic damage costs, and structural and non-structural damage costs due to possible earthquake events during the bridge life-span. While changing the lead core diameter, confined diameter, and the total thickness of the rubber layers could influence the TLCC of the bridges, the effect of lead core diameter is shown to be more significant. By using lead core diameter as the main design parameter, increasing the initial cost of LRBs up to a certain level can significantly reduce (up to 38%) TLCC of the bridges. However, beyond this limit, the TLCC may increase. Based on the results of over 13,000 Reinforced Concrete (RC) bridges under different earthquake hazard levels, the best design solutions are identified for different design objectives. The results of this study should prove the benefit of the proposed method for a more efficient design of bridges with lower TLCC.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 395
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Concrete Bridge Deck Applications
    Kendall, Alissa
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    Helfand, Gloria E.
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2008, 14 (03) : 214 - 222
  • [42] Life-cycle design of bridges in seismic regions based on lessons from the 2011 great east Japan earthquake
    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1, Shinjuku-Ku Okubo, Tokyo
    169-8555, Japan
    不详
    PA
    8015-4729, United States
    UNCECOMP - ECCOMAS Themat. Conf. Uncertain. Quantification Comput. Sci. Eng., (378-393):
  • [43] Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures
    Frangopol, DM
    Lin, KY
    Estes, AC
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (10): : 1390 - 1401
  • [44] Minimum life-cycle cost design criteria
    Wen, YK
    Kang, YJ
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS. 1-3, 1998, : 1047 - 1054
  • [45] CONTRACTORS PERCEPTION OF DESIGN TO LIFE-CYCLE COST
    ADEL, RE
    MERLINO, FX
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1977, 13 (04) : 443 - 443
  • [46] Life-cycle cost design methods and tools
    Pulakka, S
    DURABILITY OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS 8, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 2710 - 2715
  • [47] Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures
    Li, CQ
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 124 (11) : 1367 - 1368
  • [48] Dissipation's Capacity Study of Lead-Rubber Bearing System in Seismic Steel Structures Design
    Ras, Abdelouahab
    Boumechra, Nadir
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 42 (09) : 3863 - 3874
  • [49] Reliability-based and life-cycle cost-oriented design recommendations for prestressed concrete bridge girders
    Yanaka, Makoto
    Ghasemi, Seyed Hooman
    Nowak, Andrzej
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2016, 17 (05) : 836 - 847
  • [50] Life-cycle cost of all-composite suspension bridge
    Meiarashi, S
    Nishizaki, I
    Kishima, TI
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2002, 6 (04) : 206 - 214