Detectability of long gamma-ray burst afterglows from very high redshifts

被引:76
|
作者
Gou, LJ
Mészáros, P
Abel, T
Zhang, B
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Astron & Astrophys, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Phys, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Inst Adv Study, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 2004年 / 604卷 / 02期
关键词
galaxies : formation; galaxies : high-redshift; gamma rays : bursts; X-rays : general;
D O I
10.1086/382061
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are promising tools for tracing the formation of high-redshift stars, including the first generation. At very high redshifts the reverse shock emission lasts longer in the observer frame, and its importance for detection and analysis purposes relative to the forward shock increases. We consider two different models for the GRB environment, based on current ideas about the redshift dependence of gas properties in galaxies and primordial star formation. We calculate the observed flux as a function of the redshift and observer time for typical GRB afterglows, taking into account intergalactic photoionization and Lyalpha absorption opacity, as well as extinction by the Milky Way. The fluxes in the X-ray and near-IR bands are compared with the sensitivity of different detectors such as Chandra, XMM, Swift XRT, and the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). Using standard assumptions, we find that Chandra, XMM, and Swift XRT can potentially detect GRBs in the X-ray band out to very high redshifts zgreater than or similar to30. In the K and M bands, the JWST and ground-based telescopes are potentially able to detect GRBs even 1 day after the trigger out to z similar to 16 and 33, if present. While the X-ray band is insensitive to the external density and to reverse shocks, the near-IR bands provide a sensitive tool for diagnosing both the environment and the reverse shock component.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 520
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gamma-ray burst afterglows as probes of the ISM
    Schady, P.
    JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY ASTROPHYSICS, 2015, 7 : 56 - 63
  • [32] Afterglows as diagnostics of gamma-ray burst beaming
    Rhoads, JE
    GAMMA-RAY BURSTS, PTS 1 AND 2, 1998, (428): : 699 - 703
  • [33] Thermal emission in gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Badjin, D. A.
    Blinnikov, S. I.
    Postnov, K. A.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 432 (03) : 2454 - 2462
  • [34] ENERGY INJECTION IN GAMMA-RAY BURST AFTERGLOWS
    Laskar, Tanmoy
    Berger, Edo
    Margutti, Raffaella
    Perley, Daniel
    Zauderer, B. Ashley
    Sari, Re'em
    Fong, Wen-Fai
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 814 (01):
  • [35] Beaming effects in gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Huang, YF
    Lu, T
    Dai, ZG
    Cheng, KS
    HIGH ENERGY PROCESSES AND PHENOMENA IN ASTROPHYSICS, 2003, (214): : 321 - 322
  • [36] Luminosity functions of gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Jóhannesson, G.
    Björnsson, G.
    Gudmundsson, E.H.
    Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1600, 472 (02):
  • [37] On the probability of microlensing in gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Koopmans, LVE
    Wambsganss, J
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 325 (04) : 1317 - 1322
  • [38] Broadband modeling of gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Van der Horst, AJ
    Wijers, RAMJ
    Rol, E
    NUOVO CIMENTO DELLA SOCIETA ITALIANA DI FISICA C-COLLOQUIA ON PHYSICS, 2005, 28 (03): : 467 - 470
  • [39] Thermal Electrons in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows
    Ressler, Sean M.
    Laskar, Tanmoy
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 845 (02):
  • [40] Polarimetric studies of gamma-ray burst afterglows
    Klose, S
    Stecklum, B
    Fischer, O
    GAMMA-RAY BURSTS, 2000, 526 : 323 - 325