A Pedagogical Model for Ethical Inquiry into Socioscientific Issues In Science

被引:58
|
作者
Saunders, Kathryn J. [1 ]
Rennie, Leonie J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Curtin Univ Technol, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Socioscientific issues; Ethical thinking; Pedagogical model; Pluralism; Scientific literacy; SCHOOL SCIENCE; STUDENTS; EDUCATION; STS; ARGUMENTATION; CITIZENSHIP; LITERACY;
D O I
10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Internationally there is concern that many science teachers do not address socioscientific issues (SSI) in their classrooms, particularly those that are controversial. However with increasingly complex, science-based dilemmas being presented to society, such as cloning, genetic screening, alternative fuels, reproductive technologies and vaccination, there is a growing call for students to be more scientifically literate and to be able to make informed decisions on issues related to these dilemmas. There have been shifts in science curricula internationally towards a focus on scientific literacy, but research indicates that many secondary science teachers lack the support and confidence to address SSI in their classrooms. This paper reports on a project that developed a pedagogical model that scaffolded teachers through a series of stages in exploring a controversial socioscientific issue with students and supported them in the use of pedagogical strategies and facilitated ways of ethical thinking. The study builds on existing frameworks of ethical thinking. It presents an argument that in today's increasingly pluralistic society, these traditional frameworks need to be extended to acknowledge other worldviews and identities. Pluralism is proposed as an additional framework of ethical thinking in the pedagogical model, from which multiple identities, including cultural, ethnic, religious and gender perspectives, can be explored.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 274
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Socioscientific issues in science exhibitions: examining contributions of the informal science education sector
    Iannini, Ana Maria Navas
    [J]. JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2023, 22 (02):
  • [22] Reflections and Shadows: Ethical Issues in Pedagogical Documentation
    Tarr, Pat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILDHOOD STUDIES, 2011, 36 (02): : 11 - 16
  • [23] Pedagogical Challenges for Nanotechnology Education: Getting Science and Engineering Students to Examine Societal and Ethical Issues
    Toth, Eva Erdosne
    Jackson, J. Kasi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2012, 28 (05) : 1056 - 1067
  • [24] Ethical issues in communicating science
    Garrett, JM
    Bird, SJ
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2000, 6 (04) : 435 - 442
  • [25] Ethical Issues in Communicating Science
    Jinnie M. Garrett
    Stephanie J. Bird
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2007, 13 : 581 - 581
  • [26] Ethical issues in communicating science
    Jinnie M. Garreu
    Stephanie J. Bird
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2000, 6 : 435 - 442
  • [27] Moral Sensitivity in the Context of Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students
    Fowler, Samantha R.
    Zeidler, Dana L.
    Sadler, Troy D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, 31 (02) : 279 - 296
  • [28] ENHANCING STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN THE SCIENCE CLASSROOM THROUGH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES
    Chung Y.
    Yoo J.
    Kim S.-W.
    Lee H.
    Zeidler D.L.
    [J]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2016, 14 (1) : 1 - 27
  • [29] The Influences of Socioscientific Issues on General Science Teaching Self-Efficacy
    Melanie Kinskey
    Brendan E. Callahan
    [J]. Research in Science Education, 2022, 52 : 1451 - 1465
  • [30] Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues
    Kolsto, Stein Dankert
    Bungum, Berit
    Arnesen, Erik
    Isnes, Anders
    Kristensen, Terje
    Mathiassen, Ketil
    Mestad, Idar
    Quale, Andreas
    Tonning, Anne Sissel Vedvik
    Ulvik, Marit
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2006, 90 (04) : 632 - 655