Machine classification of dental images with visual search

被引:12
|
作者
Carmody, DP
McGrath, SP
Dunn, SM
van der Stelt, PF
Schouten, E
机构
[1] St Peters Coll, Dept Psychol, Jersey City, NJ 07306 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Piscataway, NJ USA
[3] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, NL-1066 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
diagnostic radiology; observer performance; images; interpretation; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80706-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors performed this study to assess the performance of a computer-based classification system that uses gaze locations of observers to define the subspace for machine learning. Materials and Methods. Thirty-two dental radiographs were classified by an expert viewer into four categories of disease of the periapical region: no disease (normal tooth), mild disease (widened periodontal ligament space), moderate disease (destruction of the lamina dura), and severe disease (resorption of bone in the periapical area). There were eight images in each category. Six observers independently viewed the images while their eye gaze position was recorded. They then classified the images into one of the four categories. A sample of image space was used as input to a machine learning routine to develop a machine classifier. Sample space was determined with three techniques: visual gaze, random selection, and constrained random selection. kappa analyses were used to compare classification accuracies with the three sampling techniques. Results. With use of the expert classification as a standard of reference, observers classified images with 57% accuracy, and the machine classified images with 84% accuracy by using the same gaze-selected features and image space. Results Of kappa analyses revealed mean values of 0.78 for gaze-selected sampling, 0.69 for random sampling, 0.68 for constrained random selection, and 0.44 for observers. The use of sample space selected with the visual gaze technique was superior to that selected with both random-selection techniques and by the observers. Conclusion. Machine classification of dental images improves the accuracy of individual observers using gaze-selected image space.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1246
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lesion classification with a visual-search model observer
    Banerjee, Kheya
    Gifford, Howard C.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 10577
  • [42] PixNet: A Localized Feature Representation for Classification and Visual Search
    Pourian, Niloufar
    Manjunath, B. S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, 2015, 17 (05) : 616 - 625
  • [43] Task Classification Model for Visual Fixation, Exploration, and Search
    Kumar, Ayush
    Tyagi, Anjul
    Burch, Michael
    Weiskopf, Daniel
    Mueller, Klaus
    ETRA 2019: 2019 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON EYE TRACKING RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS, 2019,
  • [44] Classification images: A tool to analyze visual strategies Introduction
    Eckstein, Miguel P.
    Ahumada, Albert J., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2002, 2 (01): : I - III
  • [45] Creating Visual Vocabularies for The Retrieval And Classification of Histopathology Images
    Kallipolitis, Athanasios
    Maglogiannis, Ilias
    2019 41ST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2019, : 7036 - 7039
  • [46] Classification of natural images inspired by the human visual system
    Davoodi, Paria
    Ezoji, Mehdi
    Sadeghnejad, Naser
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2023, 518 : 60 - 69
  • [47] WIND TURBINE VISUAL CLASSIFICATION FROM OVERHEAD IMAGES
    Lee, L.
    Goodwin, V.
    Biddle, J.
    IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 2463 - 2466
  • [48] AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF TEETH IN BITEWING DENTAL IMAGES USING OLPP
    Al-sherif, Nourdin
    Guo, Guodong
    Ammar, Hany H.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIMEDIA (ISM), 2012, : 92 - 95
  • [49] Support vector machine for the classification of images captured by WMSN
    Hulaj, Astrit
    Shehu, Adrian
    Bajrami, Xhevahir
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ROBOTICS & OPTIMIZATION (ICCAIRO), 2017, : 283 - 287
  • [50] Machine learning algorithm for classification of breast ultrasound images
    Karlsson, Jennie
    Ramkull, Jennifer
    Arvidsson, Ida
    Heyden, Anders
    Astrom, Kalle
    Overgaard, Niels Christian
    Lang, Kristina
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2022, 12033