Hydrate formation and particle distributions in gas-water systems

被引:61
|
作者
Akhfash, Masoumeh [1 ]
Boxall, John A. [1 ]
Aman, Zachary M. [1 ]
Johns, Michael L. [1 ]
May, Eric F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Mech & Chem Engn, Ctr Energy, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Gas hydrate; Particle distribution; Water-dominated; Under-inhibition; OIL EMULSIONS; FLOW; DEPOSITION; EQUATION; FORCE; MODEL; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2013.08.053
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Methane hydrate formation rate and resistance to Row were measured for gas-water systems in a high-pressure visual autoclave over a range of mixture velocities (300-5000 Reynolds number). A transition from a homogeneous to heterogeneous particle distribution, proposed following flowloop studies by others, was observed directly in the autoclave through three independent measurements: motor current increase (resistance to flow), pressure consumption rate (hydrate growth rate), and visual observation. The hydrate volume fraction at the transition, phi(transition), generally increased with increasing turbulence, although the relationship between Reynolds number and phi(transition), was not the same as that observed in flowloop experiments. The addition old thermodynamic inhibitor below the full inhibition threshold (i.e. under-inhibited) increased the transition point by about 10 vol% hydrate, without affecting the initial hydrate growth rate. A simple mass transport-limited formation model with no adjustable parameters was implemented to enable quantitative predictions of hydrate formation rate. In sufficiently turbulent systems the model's predictions were in excellent agreement with the observed growth rates. At lower Reynolds numbers, two mechanisms are proposed to explain the deviations between the observed and predicted growth rates. Prior to phi(transition) the low shear means that hydrate formation is limited by the rate at which the aqueous phase can be re saturated with methane. This rate is increased greatly by the formation of a hydrate bed after phi(transition), which increases the gas liquid interfacial area. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 188
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Phase Ratios of Gas-Water Hydrate Mixtures Being Pumped into Injection Wells.
    Kaptelinin, N.D.
    Malyshev, A.G.
    Malysheva, G.N.
    Oil Industry, 1978, (05): : 44 - 47
  • [22] Separation of water through gas hydrate formation
    Andersen, Torben Boch
    Thomsen, Kaj
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2009, 111 (1330): : 632 - 636
  • [23] HYDRATE FORMATION IN A HORIZONTAL FLOW OF GAS AND WATER
    DORSTEWITZ, F
    MEWES, D
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL GAS HYDRATES, 1994, 715 : 505 - 507
  • [24] Understanding the formation of nitrate from nitrogen at the interface of gas-water microbubbles
    Bose, Sandeep
    Xia, Yu
    Zare, Richard N.
    CHEMICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 15 (47) : 19764 - 19769
  • [25] Gas hydrate plug formation in partially-dispersed water-oil systems
    Akhfash, Masoumeh
    Aman, Zachary M.
    Ahn, Sang Yoon
    Johns, Michael L.
    May, Eric F.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2016, 140 : 337 - 347
  • [26] Effect of Coal Particle Size on the Kinetics of Gas Hydrate Formation
    Liu, Chuanhai
    Zhao, Liang
    Zhang, Baoyong
    Wu, Qiang
    Han, Huiming
    ACS OMEGA, 2023, 8 (48): : 46027 - 46033
  • [27] Method of gas hydrate formation for evaluation of water desalination
    A. M. Aliev
    R. Yu. Yusifov
    A. R. Kuliev
    Yu. G. Yusifov
    Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2008, 81 : 588 - 591
  • [28] Formation of a Hydrate Layer at a Gas–Water (Ice) Interface
    A. S. Chiglintseva
    A. A. Rusinov
    Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 2019, 92 : 1396 - 1405
  • [29] Dry Water as a Promoter for Gas Hydrate Formation: A Review
    Wei, Yu
    Maeda, Nobuo
    MOLECULES, 2023, 28 (09):
  • [30] Method of gas hydrate formation for evaluation of water desalination
    Aliev, A. M.
    Yusifov, R. Yu.
    Kuliev, A. R.
    Yusifov, Yu. G.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2008, 81 (04) : 588 - 591