Use of a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel Point-of-Care Test to Reduce Length of Stay in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:47
|
作者
Jang, Ji Yeon [1 ]
Shin, Sang Do [1 ]
Lee, Eui Jung [2 ]
Park, Chang Bae [1 ]
Song, Kyoung Jun [3 ]
Singer, Adam J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Anam Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Boramae Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Emergency Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
ACADEMIC-MEDICAL-CENTER; IMPACT; IMPLEMENTATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.021
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Awaiting results from laboratory testing may sometimes be a rate-limiting step in emergency department (ED) throughput prolonging length of stay and contributing to crowding. We determine whether introduction of a comprehensive metabolic panel point-of-care test can reduce ED length of stay compared with traditional central laboratory testing. Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled trial among 10,244 noncritically ill ED patients aged 15 years and older whose physicians ordered a comprehensive metabolic panel at a single, large, academic, urban medical center. Participants were randomly assigned to performance of a comprehensive metabolic panel by a point-of-care test (n=5,154) or central laboratory testing (n=5,090). The primary outcome was length of stay in the ED. Results: A point-of-care test reduced median ED length of stay among all study patients by 22 minutes (median 350 minutes [interquartile range 206 to 1,002 minutes] with point-of-care test versus median 372 minutes [interquartile range 217 to 1,150 minutes] with central laboratory testing; median difference 22 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4 to 40 minutes). A point-of-care test also reduced ED length of stay in patients discharged to home (256 versus 268 minutes; median difference 12 minutes; 95% CI 2 to 22 minutes) and with an Emergency Severity Index triage level of 3 (333 versus 355 minutes; median difference 22 minutes; 95% CI 4 to 40 minutes). Conclusion: Use of a point-of-care test for a comprehensive metabolic panel reduced ED length of stay compared with central laboratory testing in the adult ED of a single academic center. [Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61:145-151.] Please see page 146 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 151
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Verification and Implementation of a Point-of-Care Troponin Test in an Emergency Department: Successes and Challenges
    Jenkins, Karen
    Guarner, Jeannette
    Brammer, Nicole
    Evans, Crystal
    Inman, Yolanda
    Byrd, Jacquelyn
    Capes, James
    Bockman, Jane
    Isaac, Timothy
    Copeland, Solomon
    Hosier, Lynne
    Loriss, Vicky
    Franks, Nicole
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 144 : A39 - A39
  • [42] Can the Introduction of Point-of-Care Testing for Renal Function in the Emergency Department Reduce Overcrowding?
    Jarvis, Paul
    Davies, Mark
    Mitchell, Karen
    Taylor, Ian
    Baker, Marc
    POINT OF CARE, 2015, 14 (01): : 42 - 44
  • [43] The cost-effectiveness of upfront point-of-care testing in the emergency department: a secondary analysis of a randomised, controlled trial
    Goldstein, Lara Nicole
    Wells, Mike
    Vincent-Lambert, Craig
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 27 (01):
  • [44] A Smartphone App to Reduce Burnout in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Monfries, Nicholas
    Sandhu, Naminder
    Millar, Kelly
    WORKPLACE HEALTH & SAFETY, 2023, 71 (04) : 181 - 187
  • [45] The cost-effectiveness of upfront point-of-care testing in the emergency department: a secondary analysis of a randomised, controlled trial
    Lara Nicole Goldstein
    Mike Wells
    Craig Vincent-Lambert
    Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 27
  • [46] A prospective randomized controlled trial of point-of-care testing on the coronary care unit
    Collinson, PO
    John, C
    Lynch, S
    Rao, A
    Canepa-Anson, R
    Carson, E
    Cramp, D
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 41 : 397 - 404
  • [47] Effect of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound-Driven vs Standard Diagnostic Pathway on 24-Hour Hospital Stay in Emergency Department Patients with Dyspnea-Protocol for A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ovesen, Stig Holm
    Skaarup, Soren Helbo
    Aagaard, Rasmus
    Kirkegaard, Hans
    Lofgren, Bo
    Arvig, Michael Dan
    Bibby, Bo Martin
    Posth, Stefan
    Laursen, Christian B.
    Weile, Jesper
    OPEN ACCESS EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 16 : 211 - 219
  • [48] Emergency Department versus Radiology Department Pelvic Ultrasound and Effect on Patient Length of Stay: A Randomized Control Trial
    Bertoglio, K.
    Fischetti, C.
    Cruz, A.
    Vandordaklou, N.
    Gilani, C.
    Alotis, A.
    Mervis, E.
    Fox, C.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 62 (04) : S80 - S80
  • [49] Removing the HOCUS from POCUS: The use of point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department
    Cobbett, Joanne
    Carlin, Emma
    Forbes, Jessica
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2020, 32 (01) : 151 - 154
  • [50] EVALUATION OF A POINT-OF-CARE INR DEVICE IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - IS THE CURRENT USE OPTIMAL?
    Verheul, Rolf
    Tong, Wing
    Veen, Mischa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 39 : 125 - 125