Could SO2 and CO2 emissions trading schemes achieve co-benefits of emissions reduction?

被引:22
|
作者
Hu, Yucai [1 ]
Li, Ranran [1 ]
Du, Lei [2 ]
Ren, Shenggang [2 ]
Chevallier, Julien [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yanshan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Qinhuangdao 066004, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[3] IPAG Business Sch, IPAG Lab, 184 Blvd Saint Germain, F-75006 Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris 8 LED, 2 Rue Liberte, Saint Denis, France
关键词
Emissions trading scheme(ETS); Sulfur dioxide (SO2); Carbon dioxide (CO2); Synergistic effect; INNOVATION; SYSTEM; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113252
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The challenge of air pollution and climate change has resulted in the emergence internationally of emission trading systems (ETSs) related mainly to SO2 emissions and CO2 emissions. Although the effectiveness of ETSs has been discussed extensively, it remains unclear whether such policies aimed at reducing different types of emissions are able to achieve overall emissions reductions. Based on China's pilots of SO2 ETS and CO2 ETS, we employ a DID model and investigate the synergistic effects of SO2 ETS and CO2 ETS. The results show first, that the SO2 ETS and CO2 ETS reduced SO2 and CO2 emissions, indicating effective implementation of these policies, second, that the synergistic emissions reduction effect suggests that the SO2 ETS has a limited effect on reducing CO2 emissions due to the maturity of SO2 capture technologies but that the CO2 ETS significantly reduced SO2 emissions and achieved the co-benefits of SO2 emission reduction, third, further analysis showed that the co-benefits of CO2 ETS derive from reduced fossil energy consumption and improved energy efficiency whereas the impact of the SO2 ETS is limited. This work adds to empirical evidences on the synergistic effects of ETS, which is conductive to optimize the policy design to achieve synergistic emissions reduction effect.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of emissions trading and carbon sequestration on the cost of CO2 emissions mitigation
    Mahasenan, N
    Scott, MJ
    Smith, SJ
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1177 - 1182
  • [32] Carbon co-benefits of tighter SO2 and NOx regulations in China
    Nam, Kyung-Min
    Waugh, Caleb J.
    Paltsev, Sergey
    Reilly, John M.
    Karplus, Valerie J.
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (06): : 1648 - 1661
  • [33] Analysing the Co-Benefits of transport fleet and fuel policies in reducing PM2.5 and CO2 emissions
    Alam, Md. Saniul
    Hyde, Bernard
    Duffy, Paul
    McNabola, Aonghus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 623 - 634
  • [34] Using CO2 as a feedstock could slash emissions
    Bourzac, Katherine
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2019, 97 (20) : 15 - 15
  • [35] With transparency towards the reduction of CO2 emissions
    Benen, Marco
    Banik, Tim
    JOT, Journal fuer Oberflaechentechnik, 2024, 64 (03): : 24 - 27
  • [36] Partial Gasification for CO2 Emissions Reduction
    Gnanapragasam, Nirmal V.
    Reddy, Bale V.
    Rosen, Marc A.
    GLOBAL WARMING: ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, 2010, : 179 - 195
  • [37] Polish veto on the reduction of CO2 emissions
    Szymanski, K.
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2012, 91 (04): : 460 - 460
  • [38] CO2 emissions
    不详
    CHEMISTRY IN BRITAIN, 2000, 36 (07) : 15 - 15
  • [39] CO2 EMISSIONS
    OLIVER, RTD
    NATURE, 1992, 359 (6390) : 9 - 9
  • [40] EMISSIONS OF CO, CO2, SO2, NOx AND ASH DURING CO-COMBUSTION OF BIOMASS IN A 25 kW BOILER
    Wilk, Ryszapd K.
    Sarnowski, Tomasz
    CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING-INZYNIERIA CHEMICZNA I PROCESOWA, 2009, 30 (02): : 279 - 289