Low dose computed tomography in suspected acute renal colic

被引:59
|
作者
Meagher, T
Sukumar, VP
Collingwood, J
Crawley, T
Schofield, D
Henson, J
Lakin, K
Connolly, D
Giles, J
机构
[1] Stoke Mandeville Hosp, Dept Radiol, Aylesbury HP21 8AL, Bucks, England
[2] Stoke Mandeville Hosp Trust, Dept Med Phys, Aylesbury, Bucks, England
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Urol, Swindon, Wilts, England
[4] Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Radiol, Swindon, Wilts, England
[5] Northampton Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Northampton, England
[6] Conquest Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hastings, E Sussex, England
关键词
computed tomography; radiation dose; acute ureteral obstruction; renal colic; flank pain;
D O I
10.1053/crad.2001.0842
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) of the renal tract in suspected renal colic using reduced exposure factors maintains diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Prospective multi-centre cohort study. Patients with suspected renal colic were examined using computed tomography (CT) of the renal tract followed by intravenous urography (IVU) in four different centres with five different CT systems. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients with suspected renal colic had CT of the renal tract followed by IVU. CT was performed with reduced exposure factors, giving a mean CT effective dose of 3.5 (range 2.8-4.5) mSv compared with 1.5 mSv for IVU. Ureteric calculi were detected in 43 patients: CT and IVU detected 40 (93%) ureteric calculi. CT identified other lesions causing symptoms in five patients and identified renal calculi in 24 patients. IVU identified renal calculi in six patients and made false positive diagnosis of renal calculi in seven patients. Mean examination time for CT was 5 minutes and for IVU was 80 minutes. CONCLUSION: CT examination at reduced exposure factors maintains the diagnostic accuracy recorded in other series. (C) 2001 The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 876
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors for urologic intervention and alternate diagnoses in people having computed tomography urography for suspected renal colic
    Blecher, Gabriel
    Meek, Robert
    Egerton-Warburton, Diana
    McCahy, Philip
    Bach, Cindy
    Boulos, Daniel
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2016, 28 (01) : 56 - 61
  • [22] Incidental hepatic steatosis on unenhanced computed tomography performed for suspected renal colic: Gaps in reporting and documentation
    Kutaiba, Numan
    Richmond, Danielle
    Morey, Matthew
    Brennan, Daniel
    Rotella, Joe-Anthony
    Ardalan, Zaid
    Goodwin, Mark
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (04) : 431 - 438
  • [23] Prevalence of alternative diagnoses in patients with suspected uncomplicated renal colic undergoing computed tomography: a prospective study
    Pernet, Julie
    Abergel, Sandra
    Parra, Jerome
    Ayed, Amine
    Bokobza, Jerome
    Renard-Penna, Raphaelle
    Tostivint, Isabelle
    Bitker, Marc-Olivier
    Riou, Bruno
    Freund, Yonathan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (01) : 67 - 73
  • [24] Computed tomography in suspected acute appendicitis
    Jones, PF
    SURGERY, 2001, 129 (04) : 514 - 515
  • [25] Unenhanced Computed Tomography in Acute Renal Colic Reduces Cost Outside Radiology Department
    Lauritsen, J.
    Andersen, J. R.
    Nordling, J.
    Thomsen, H. S.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2008, 49 (10) : 1182 - 1186
  • [26] Acute renal colic: Value of unenhanced spiral computed tomography compared with intravenous urography
    Wong, SK
    Ng, LG
    Tan, BS
    Cheng, CWS
    Chee, CTY
    Chan, LP
    Lo, HG
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2001, 30 (06) : 568 - 572
  • [27] Abdominal plain film in patients admitted with clinical suspicion of renal colic: Should it be replaced by low-dose computed tomography?
    Poletti, PA
    Platon, A
    Rutschmann, OT
    Verdun, FR
    Schmidlin, FR
    Iselin, CE
    Vermeulen, B
    Sarasin, FOP
    Buhler, LH
    Becker, CD
    UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (01) : 64 - 68
  • [28] Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: Experience with 1000 consecutive examinations
    Katz, DS
    Scheer, M
    Lumerman, JH
    Mellinger, BC
    Stillman, CA
    Lane, MJ
    UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [29] ULTRA-LOW DOSE CT COMPARABLE TO STANDARD CT IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED RENAL COLIC
    Archambault, Jason
    Hrymak, Carmen
    Sivalingam, Sri
    Kirkpatrick, Iain
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E880 - E880
  • [30] Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic
    Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre
    Platon, Alexandra
    Rutschmann, Olivier T.
    Schmidlin, Franz R.
    Iselin, Christophe E.
    Becker, Christoph D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (04) : 927 - 933