Phase unwrapping algorithms in laser propagation simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Du Rui [1 ]
Yang Lijia [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Optoelect Sci & Engn, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Phase screen; Unwrapping algorithm; Atmospheric propagation simulation; Block least squares; Mask-cut; Minimal discontinuity; Active on vertex network;
D O I
10.1117/12.2035045
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Currently simulating on laser propagation in atmosphere usually need to deal with beam in strong turbulence, which may lose a part of information via Fourier Transform to simulate the transmission, makes the phase of beam as a 2-D array wrap by 2 pi. An effective unwrapping algorithm is needed for continuing result and faster calculation. The unwrapping algorithms in atmospheric propagation are similar to the unwrapping algorithm in radar or 3-D surface rebuilding, but not the same. In this article, three classic unwrapping algorithms: the block least squares (BLS), mask-cut (MCUT), and the Flynn's minimal discontinuity algorithm (FMD) are tried in wave-front reconstruction simulation. Each of those algorithms are tested 100 times in 6 same conditions, including low(64x64), medium(128x128), and high(256x256) resolution phase array, with and without noises. Compared the results, the conclusions are delivered as follows. The BLS-based algorithm is the fastest, and the result is acceptable in low resolution environment without noise. The MCUT are higher in accuracy, though they are slower with the array resolution increased, and it is sensitive to noise, resulted in large area errors. Flynn's algorithm has the better accuracy, and it occupies large memory in calculation. After all, the article delivered a new algorithm that based on Active on Vertex (AOV) Network, to build a logical graph to cut the search space then find minimal discontinuity solution. The AOV is faster than MCUT in dealing with high resolution phase arrays, and better accuracy as FMD that has been tested.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phase unwrapping algorithms for radar interferometry: Residue-cut, least-squares, and synthesis algorithms
    Zebker, HA
    Lu, YP
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1998, 15 (03): : 586 - 598
  • [42] PARALLEL ALGORITHMS FOR PHASE UNWRAPPING BASED ON MARKOV RANDOM-FIELD MODELS
    MARROQUIN, JL
    TAPIA, M
    RODRIGUEZVERA, R
    SERVIN, M
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1995, 12 (12) : 2578 - 2585
  • [43] Mathematic descriptions and discussions of 2D phase-unwrapping algorithms
    Xu, Lihua
    Su, Xianyu
    Jiguang Zazhi/Laser Journal, 2002, 23 (02):
  • [44] Comparison of path-following and least-squares phase unwrapping algorithms
    Pritt, MD
    IGARSS '97 - 1997 INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS VOLS I-IV: REMOTE SENSING - A SCIENTIFIC VISION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 1997, : 872 - 874
  • [45] Two dimensional phase unwrapping algorithms for fringe pattern analysis: a comparison study
    Yang Fang
    Wang Zhaomin
    Wen Yongfu
    Qu Weijuan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS 2014, 2015, 9302
  • [46] Simulation of laser propagation in a turbulent atmosphere
    Frehlich, Rod
    Applied Optics, 2000, 39 (03): : 393 - 397
  • [47] Simulation of laser propagation in a turbulent atmosphere
    Frehlich, R
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2000, 39 (03) : 393 - 397
  • [48] The construction of simulation algorithms for laser fusion
    Pei, Wenbing
    COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2007, 2 (02) : 255 - 270
  • [49] Algorithms for simulation of speckle (laser and otherwise)
    Duncan, Donald D.
    Kirkpatrick, Sean J.
    COMPLEX DYNAMICS AND FLUCTUATIONS IN BIOMEDICAL PHOTONICS V, 2008, 6855
  • [50] Morphological phase unwrapping
    Soille, P
    OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 1999, 32 (04) : 339 - 352