A Function Accounting for Training Set Size and Marker Density to Model the Average Accuracy of Genomic Prediction

被引:42
|
作者
Erbe, Malena [1 ]
Gredler, Birgit [2 ]
Seefried, Franz Reinhold [2 ]
Bapst, Beat [2 ]
Simianer, Henner [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Anim Sci, Anim Breeding & Genet Grp, Gottingen, Germany
[2] Qualitas AG, Zug, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
BREEDING VALUES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; SELECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0081046
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Prediction of genomic breeding values is of major practical relevance in dairy cattle breeding. Deterministic equations have been suggested to predict the accuracy of genomic breeding values in a given design which are based on training set size, reliability of phenotypes, and the number of independent chromosome segments (Me). The aim of our study was to find a general deterministic equation for the average accuracy of genomic breeding values that also accounts for marker density and can be fitted empirically. Two data sets of similar to 698 Holstein Friesian bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and 19332 Brown Swiss bulls genotyped with 50 K SNPs and imputed to,600 K SNPs were available. Different k-fold (k = 2-10, 15, 20) cross-validation scenarios (50 replicates, random assignment) were performed using a genomic BLUP approach. A maximum likelihood approach was used to estimate the parameters of different prediction equations. The highest likelihood was obtained when using a modified form of the deterministic equation of Daetwyler et al. (2010), augmented by a weighting factor (w) based on the assumption that the maximum achievable accuracy is w < 1. The proportion of genetic variance captured by the complete SNP sets (w(2)) was 0.76 to 0.82 for Holstein Friesian and 0.72 to 0.75 for Brown Swiss. When modifying the number of SNPs, w was found to be proportional to the log of the marker density up to a limit which is population and trait specific and was found to be reached with,209000 SNPs in the Brown Swiss population studied.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Correction to: High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection
    Ling-Yun Chang
    Sajjad Toghiani
    Ashley Ling
    Sammy E. Aggrey
    Romdhane Rekaya
    BMC Genetics, 19
  • [32] Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker x Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model
    Lopez-Cruz, Marco
    Crossa, Jose
    Bonnett, David
    Dreisigacker, Susanne
    Poland, Jesse
    Jannink, Jean-Luc
    Singh, Ravi P.
    Autrique, Enrique
    de los Campos, Gustavo
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2015, 5 (04): : 569 - 582
  • [33] Genomic prediction and training set optimization in a structured Mediterranean oat population
    Simon Rio
    Luis Gallego-Sánchez
    Gracia Montilla-Bascón
    Francisco J. Canales
    Julio Isidro y Sánchez
    Elena Prats
    Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2021, 134 : 3595 - 3609
  • [34] Genomic prediction and training set optimization in a structured Mediterranean oat population
    Rio, Simon
    Gallego-Sanchez, Luis
    Montilla-Bascon, Gracia
    Canales, Francisco J.
    Sanchez, Julio Isidro y
    Prats, Elena
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2021, 134 (11) : 3595 - 3609
  • [35] A marker weighting approach for enhancing within-family accuracy in genomic prediction
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Crespo-Herrera, Leonardo
    Xavier, Alencar
    Godwa, Manje
    Beyene, Yoseph
    Pierre, Carolina Saint
    de la Rosa-Santamaria, Roberto
    Salinas-Ruiz, Josafhat
    Gerard, Guillermo
    Vitale, Paolo
    Dreisigacker, Susanne
    Lillemo, Morten
    Grignola, Fernando
    Sarinelli, Martin
    Pozzo, Ezequiel
    Quiroga, Marco
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Crossa, Jose
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [36] Marker Selection in Multivariate Genomic Prediction Improves Accuracy of Low Heritability Traits
    Klapste, Jaroslav
    Dungey, Heidi S.
    Telfer, Emily J.
    Suontama, Mari
    Graham, Natalie J.
    Li, Yongjun
    McKinley, Russell
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2020, 11
  • [37] Impact of reference population size and marker density on accuracy of population imputation
    Kranjevicova, Anita
    Kasna, Eva
    Brzakova, Michaela
    Pribyl, Josef
    Vostry, Lubos
    CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 64 (10) : 405 - 410
  • [38] Similarity to molecules in the training set is a good discriminator for prediction accuracy in QSAR
    Sheridan, RP
    Feuston, BP
    Maiorov, VN
    Kearsley, SK
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2004, 44 (06): : 1912 - 1928
  • [39] Revealing the interaction effect on the accuracy of genomic selection between marker density and genetic architecture
    Zhao, Ji
    Ke, Qiaozhen
    Miao, Lingwei
    Wang, Jiaying
    Bai, Yulin
    Pu, Fei
    Zhou, Tao
    Xu, Peng
    AQUACULTURE, 2023, 563
  • [40] Effect of training-sample size and classification difficulty on the accuracy of genomic predictors
    Vlad Popovici
    Weijie Chen
    Brandon D Gallas
    Christos Hatzis
    Weiwei Shi
    Frank W Samuelson
    Yuri Nikolsky
    Marina Tsyganova
    Alex Ishkin
    Tatiana Nikolskaya
    Kenneth R Hess
    Vicente Valero
    Daniel Booser
    Mauro Delorenzi
    Gabriel N Hortobagyi
    Leming Shi
    W Fraser Symmans
    Lajos Pusztai
    Breast Cancer Research, 12