Cellular handset integration - SIP vs. SOC and best design practices for SIP

被引:0
|
作者
Lyne, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Instruments Inc, Dallas, TX 75243 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
There has recently been much discussion regarding the pros and cons of Silicon on Chip (SOC) verses System in Package (SIP). SOC is firstly driven by cost reduction and secondly by miniaturization. This involves cost reduction at component level as well at system (handset) level. Cost reduction comes from a reduction of total component count, both ICs and passives, as well as reduction in mother board area. Further cost avoidance comes from a bill of materials with few components, giving the benefits of lower surface mounting costs, and lower inventory overhead. Similarly, SIP can offer some of these benefits. However, in most cases, the primary motivation for SIP is miniaturization, rather than cost reduction. An aggressive goal for a SIP product would be to achieve the same cost for the SIP as the sum of the elements integrated in to the SIP. Even if this aggressive cost goal is not achieved, the benefits from the miniaturization are frequently sufficient to justify the development of a SIP product. In reality, there is no conflict between the SOC and SIP technologies. Many times both techniques are employed synergistically. This paper continues this SOC vs SIP discussion, focusing on SIP, and demonstrating the synergism between the two.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 770
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Cellular handset integration - SIP vs. SOC
    Krenik, W
    Buss, D
    Rickert, P
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 2004 CUSTOM INTEGRATED CIRCUITS CONFERENCE, 2004, : 63 - 70
  • [2] Cellular handset integration - SIP versus SOC
    Krenik, W
    Buss, DD
    Rickert, P
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, 2005, 40 (09) : 1839 - 1846
  • [4] Sip vs SoC for mobile communications applications
    Belot, Didier
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RADIO-FREQUENCY INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS: ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES FOR EMERGING WIRELESS SYSTEMS, 2007, : 231 - 231
  • [5] Cell phone integration: SiP, SoC, and PoP
    Rickert, Peter
    Krenik, William
    [J]. IEEE DESIGN & TEST OF COMPUTERS, 2006, 23 (03): : 188 - 195
  • [6] RF-SiP design and integration
    Bagdasarian, Bergi
    Blonski, Joe
    Karim, Nozad
    Mao, Jingkun
    [J]. 2005 ASIA-PACIFIC MICROWAVE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 1287 - 1290
  • [7] An Efficient Approach to SiP Design Integration
    Chan, Meng-Syue
    Wang, Chun-Yao
    Chen, Yung-Chih
    [J]. ISQED 2009: PROCEEDINGS 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON QUALITY ELECTRONIC DESIGN, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 241 - 247
  • [8] Multilayer mobility management for all-IP networks: Pure SIP vs. hybrid SIP/Mobile IP
    Politis, C
    Chew, KA
    Tafazolli, R
    [J]. 57TH IEEE VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VTC 2003-SPRING, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 2500 - 2504
  • [9] RETRACTED: Trends in broadcast receiver integration: SoC versus SiP (Retracted Article)
    Maxim, A.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE RADIO AND WIRELESS SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 183 - +
  • [10] A Versatile SoC/SiP Sensor Interface for Industrial Applications: Design Considerations
    Ali, Mohamed
    Nabavi, Morteza
    Hassan, Ahmad
    Honarparvar, Mohammad
    Savaria, Yvon
    Sawan, Mohamad
    [J]. 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROELECTRONICS (IEEE ICM 2019), 2019, : 40 - 43